Topic awaiting preservation: April JavaScript contest - Graphic creation - comments (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England |
posted 04-12-2004 21:27
Post any comments/thoughts/questions you have about the month's contest here! |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: [s]underwater[/s] under-snow in Juneau |
posted 04-12-2004 22:24
just a quick question about function declaration and line counts: code: function myCoolFunction(){
|
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England |
posted 04-12-2004 22:47
yes sorry. Some of these rules are clarified slightly more in the other topic. Closing brackets do not count as lines |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: France |
posted 04-22-2004 19:17
Just a code snippet to relive that thread and clarify the rules ( though I think nobody will sue you if you make a 21 or 22 lines entry ) code: <script type="text/javascript"> The document.body.onclick = function() does not count as a line as it's not some effective code and the function call could be put in the BODY tag ( or anyother HTML tag ). |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: France |
posted 04-29-2004 15:38 |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 04-29-2004 19:02
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: France |
posted 04-29-2004 19:17
Indeed it's possible to put a lot of instructions in a row with the ternary operator ( like I did in the first for statement of Nebula ), but it seems tricky ( at first sight ) to declare some functions and/or trap some events at the same time. code: { alert(1) }{ alert(2) }{ function n(){ alert('n') }}{ n() }{ n() } But inserting a newline around the {} is a kinda implied rule. No ? |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 04-29-2004 19:31
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: [s]underwater[/s] under-snow in Juneau |
posted 04-29-2004 21:28
Ok, here's my pathetic little entry. It is actually a page for my little nephew to play with, so that's why it may seem a bit childish. (that's my excuse anyways....) |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: France |
posted 04-29-2004 23:13
Notice, for those who still don't have a browser supporting the 32bits PNG ( a standard introduced in october 1996 by the W3C ), Mozilla Firefox takes only 6.2mb |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Sthlm, Sweden |
posted 04-30-2004 09:51
Don't know if I've got the rules correctly, care to check this out to see if it qualifies? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: France |
posted 04-30-2004 10:13 |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 04-30-2004 15:11
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 04-30-2004 15:52
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 04-30-2004 16:44
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England |
posted 04-30-2004 17:32
InI: Wow, that looks amazing. Shame its not animated, that must be awesome, but hey. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: France |
posted 04-30-2004 18:02 |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 04-30-2004 19:06
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England |
posted 05-01-2004 14:24
ok, unless there are any late entries (which are, of course, welcome), I propose we take a "vote" of sorts. I reckong InI should win cos its a very cool effect, and its only the limitations of the net preventing it being animated (I believe). |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 05-01-2004 16:22
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |