Closed Thread Icon

Topic awaiting preservation: Synchro? Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=25393" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: Synchro?" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: Synchro?\

 
Author Thread
kaboi
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Nairobi, Kenya
Insane since: Mar 2002

posted posted 04-01-2005 10:31

Hi there's this riddle in a popular radio station and no one seems to get it right...

My wrist watch is always on time, my wall clock loses two minutes everyday, my alarm clock gains two minutes everyday.

Today (march3rd) I synchronized both my wall clock and my alarm clock with my wrist watch.

Question: When is the next time (day and time) will they all tell the same time?

Think you can Synchro this?

Ps. I got 360 days 7 hrs or something close. WRONG

Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted posted 04-01-2005 11:11

Well... my brain says says exactly 360 days.
They have to lose (or gain) twelve hours to show the same time again.
That's 720 minutes, and that diveded by two gives us 360 'loss/gain' events. We have one loss/gain event a day,
so I'd assume they need 360 days.

mahjqa
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: The Demented Side of the Fence
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 04-01-2005 15:26

Yup, same here. Apparently, we're overlooking something.

Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted posted 04-01-2005 16:23

Without the exact time you synchronized your clocks on march 3rd, we'll never figuer out the next date. (which eventueally involves a shift between summer and winter time, and therefore has to be adjusted by a day)

kaboi
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Nairobi, Kenya
Insane since: Mar 2002

posted posted 04-02-2005 18:02

The key lies in March 3rd. Thats the hint they gave. Further more they just need the exact day that all the clocks will show the same time.

(Edited by kaboi on 04-02-2005 18:03)

Skaarjj
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: :morF
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 04-03-2005 09:32

February 26, or 27 if it's a leap year. 365 days (average) in a year (leap years excluded) and 360 loss/gain events (one per day) until each clock has gone ahead by 12 hours or back by 12 hours. This gives us a difference of 5 days. Now, taking 5 off March 3rd will give us February 26 becuase there's only 28 days in February. However if it's a leap year there'll be 29 days in February, bringing the 5 day subtraction up to February 27


Justice 4 Pat Richard

eyezaer
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist

From: the Psychiatric Ward
Insane since: Sep 2000

posted posted 04-03-2005 09:37

is it a trick?... is the answer, "next time I sync up my clocks"?

Slime
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist

From: Massachusetts, USA
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 04-03-2005 10:29
quote:
They have to lose (or gain) twelve hours to show the same time again.



Are you sure? Isn't it possible that they might show the same time sometime before that happens?


 

Petskull
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 04-03-2005 22:08

I think Slimer is right-

Don't you need six hour gains/losses?

1:00am - 1:00pm?

Too bad all the people who know how to run the world are busy running taxicabs or cutting hair. - George Burns
ICQ: 67751342

poi
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: France
Insane since: Jun 2002

posted posted 04-03-2005 22:21
quote:
Question: When is the next time (day and time) will they all tell the same time?

All, includes the wrist watch too. With only 6 hours of shift, the wall clock and alarm clock will show the same time, but not the wrist watch.

Nimraw
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Sthlm, Sweden
Insane since: Sep 2000

posted posted 04-04-2005 09:58

Just a thought... are we sure none of the clocks are displaying time in a 24hour-format?

Or if all of them is on 12hour-format, but one is a digital one displaying am/pm information?

Skaarjj
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: :morF
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 04-04-2005 11:59
quote:
Petskull said:

I think Slimer is right-

Don't you need six hour gains/losses?

1:00am - 1:00pm?




1:00am - 1:00pm is twelve hours, not six


Justice 4 Pat Richard

poi
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: France
Insane since: Jun 2002

posted posted 04-04-2005 13:16
quote:
1:00am - 1:00pm is twelve hours, not six

Yep but one clock gained 6 hours, and the other lost 6 hours.

AlterEgo
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: 54'0"N, 1'33"W
Insane since: Jul 2004

posted posted 04-04-2005 14:00
quote:
poi said:

All, includes the wrist watch too. With only 6 hours of shift, the wall clock and alarm clock will show the same time, but not the wrist watch.



So doesn't that mean they'll never sync up again? Because two can be synchronized at a time, but never three?

Skaarjj
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: :morF
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 04-04-2005 14:03
quote:
AlterEgo said:

So doesn't that mean they'll never sync up again? Because two can be synchronized at a time, but never three?



No, becuase after six hours more the wrist watch will be showing the same time as both of the clocks.


Justice 4 Pat Richard

Nimraw
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Sthlm, Sweden
Insane since: Sep 2000

posted posted 04-04-2005 16:19

For arguments sake say that we start at midnight and that I'm wrong in my theory of 24-hour format.

After a total gain/loss of six hours (30th of August) the wall clock and the alarm clock will be in sync at 6, but the wristwatch will still show the correct time (ie midnight).
So a 6-hour shift will not do the trick so Skaarjjs initial calculation is reasonable.

However I think the correct answer should be the 21st of February 2007 for a full 24hour cycle.

Let's hope none of the clocks show date as well

shekky
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: St Louis ,Mo.
Insane since: Aug 2002

posted posted 04-04-2005 19:19

I concur with Skaarjj and Nimraw
A quick lil excel sheet
here
demonstrates the Feb. 21st just under 2 years barring a leap year in the year following the synchronization

A few more formulas added in could check for any other times in the middle that "may" sych up but it doesnt appear to be probable.

shekk

kaboi
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Nairobi, Kenya
Insane since: Mar 2002

posted posted 04-05-2005 10:47

Yap Skaarjj, Nimraw and the descriptive Shekky nailed it. The answer was Feb 21st 2007.

Too bad some other guy got the $200 bucks before i could call in.

Thanx guys.

DmS
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: Sthlm, Sweden
Insane since: Oct 2000

posted posted 04-05-2005 12:47
quote:
Too bad some other guy got the $200 bucks before i could call in.


you would have shared... right?

/Dan

{cell 260} {Blog}
-{ ?The Internet treats censorship as a malfunction and routes around it.? (-Barlow, John Perry) }-

« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu