Closed Thread Icon

Topic awaiting preservation: Apple Sues Apple (Page 1 of 1) Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=6891" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: Apple Sues Apple (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: Apple Sues Apple <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\

 
bitdamaged
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: 100101010011 <-- right about here
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 09-12-2003 17:26

And while usually apple computers is so on top of things.

then they do this



.:[ Never resist a perfect moment ]:.

Veneficuz
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: A graveyard of dreams
Insane since: Mar 2001

posted posted 09-12-2003 18:21

It is obvious that something like this had to happen. There was about 10 years between the first and second lawsuit, so it is only natural that there is about 10 years between the second and third

Seriously thought, that is really stupid of the Apple Comp. people if the facts there are correct. Sounds like they got another loss in court to look forward to...

_________________________
"There are 10 kinds of people; those who know binary, those who don't and those who start counting at zero"

Petskull
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted posted 09-12-2003 19:09

Ironically enough, this link from the same site seems to fit.. http://www.cashncarrion.co.uk/?listPos=&op=catalogue-products-null&prodCategoryID=14


Code - CGI - links - DHTML - Javascript - Perl - programming - Magic - http://www.twistedport.com
ICQ: 67751342

prawnstar69
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: Loughborough, Leics. UK
Insane since: Sep 2003

posted posted 09-12-2003 19:48

It is a bit petty, but then most things like this are.

Skaarjj
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: :morF
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 09-13-2003 02:09

There are actually no legal ground for suing as trading under a registered name, since the record label is registered as 'Apple' and it's grown to corporation size, which it why it's called 'Apple Corporation'...but the MAC computer mob at orgiinally registered, and still correctly called these days 'Apple Computers'...that one word is enough to protect them, legally, as they are not trading under the name 'Apple'...they trade under either 'Apple Computers' or 'Apple MAC Computers'.

So I can't see where Apple Corp. has a legal leg to stand on in this issue

Slime
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist

From: Massachusetts, USA
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted posted 09-13-2003 02:43

Just when I was waiting for itunes for Windows!

Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted posted 09-13-2003 09:13

actually, with german law they very well might have a case... something about trademarks being easily confused with each other...

recently a company ruled that b-mobile.de had to give up their brand, for it's pronounciation was to close to t-mobile.de...

Dufty
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Where I'm from isn't where I'm at!
Insane since: Jun 2002

posted posted 09-13-2003 10:59

I just don't see it myself... it seems far too easy to sue people these days, even for the most tenuous of links:

Apple corp = Record Production and distribution.
Apple Comp = Make music on it if you like, but first and foremost it's a personal computer.

Why on earth do they have a problem with this?

Skaarjj
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: :morF
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 09-13-2003 11:51

But why is this being judged under German Law?

Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted posted 09-13-2003 13:06

it isn't but how much would you wanne bet that trademark law is not covered by some WTO treaty that most 'first-world' countries ratified and turned into local law already?

« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu