Preserved Topic: Animated rollovers (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Santa Barbara, CA, USA |
posted 05-29-2000 01:50
Doc, |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 05-29-2000 04:12
That's a lot more complex. If you look in the code, you'll see the setTimeout function, with 3 images listed. When you mouseover the image, it flips to one image for a few milliseconds, then to the 3rd image, then back to the second, then back to the first. Doc did a bang-up job with the images, and a really creative script, so the animation is really smooth. <P>You'll also notice this in the code:<P><!--DocOzone's Javascript code, copyright 1998 |
Maniac (V) Lord Mad Scientist Sovereign of all the lands Ozone and just beyond that little green line over there... From: Stockholm, Sweden |
posted 05-29-2000 09:19
http://www.ozones.com/flourish.html <P>The flourish page is the simplest version of this, I created this page with just one animated donut for folks to get the idea from. Check it out, it's a real simple script, and quite easy to figure out.<P> |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 05-29-2000 18:38
Yeah, I was pretty impressed when I first figured out what you were doing there Doc -- I've been planning on using that script for a while now, but haven't come up with anything to use it on just yet.<P> |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Santa Barbara, CA, USA |
posted 05-29-2000 22:16
DOC, |
Maniac (V) Lord Mad Scientist Sovereign of all the lands Ozone and just beyond that little green line over there... From: Stockholm, Sweden |
posted 05-30-2000 00:22
Cool! I liked the flash movie, but I have ISDN, heh. The "loading" movie was kind of boring, it swapped fast enough to make me think of <blink>ing type, yow! I think if you're going to use flash, a whole bunch of time should go into your loading movie, if tyou leave out the sound, they can be teeny-tiny. Nice work, I enjoyed it!<P> |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
posted 05-30-2000 15:20
If no one minds me going off the subject for a while, but how is it that all these people that submit their sites for review manage to have full domain names? I mean is there are free domain name server out there or something? It really gets my goat (baaaaah!) that I am stuck at geoexcrements and all these other people have domain names!!!<P><P> |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 05-30-2000 18:12
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$<P> <P> |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Midlothian, VA USA |
posted 05-30-2000 20:31
Hey ya'll, I'm curious... going back to the original topic, is it more efficient to use the timeouts with many images or just use an animated gif in the rollover?<P>------------- |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 05-30-2000 21:02
I try not to combine animated gifs and javascript; it causes problems, and also, IE and NN time animated gifs differently. |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Santa Barbara, CA, USA |
posted 05-31-2000 21:20
Skaarjj,<P>In response to your question. I work for an individual that has hosting, streaming media capabilities. I do all his web design, part of my deal is free hosting, no cap on the MB. not bad huh? nudgenudge winkwink<P>the ART<P>Greyhawke |
Maniac (V) Lord Mad Scientist Sovereign of all the lands Ozone and just beyond that little green line over there... From: Stockholm, Sweden |
posted 06-01-2000 00:38
Well, with netscape as soon as you click it triggers the "stop animations" thingy, and that's that for animations. <P>I like javascript animations because they can be programmed to be a lot less predictable. A simple loop on an animation will drive most folk buggy, producing epileptic fits on some! A javascript animation can be timed to loop on a random interval, much nicer on the brain.<P> |