Topic: http://www.raheelism.vze.com (Reivews needed on updated site)

updated quite a few things on the site... plz check again n tell me what now to improve on....

critics, feedback, comments, suggestions or whatever u like... be as nasty as u can be.... http://www.raheelism.vze.com

raheel..

dA 1 n' oNLe,
raheel
http://www.raheelism.vze.com

Previous Thread: http://ozoneasylum.com/Forum6/HTML/001015.html

dA 1 n' oNLe,
raheel

http://www.raheelism.vze.com

You've updated quite a few things on the site?
No, I don't think so.

While I can't compare this version of the site to the old one because you don't have a link to what it used to look like...
I have a fairly good memory of it.... and you haven't changed nearly anything that I can tell.
I read back through the old thread and saw that many of the comments were still applicable.

If in fact you have changed a number of things... perhaps it'd be good if you pointed them out for us.
Otherwise I see it as just another method of trying to pimp your site like you were yesterday up in this thread.


[This message has been edited by Michael (edited 04-12-2003).]

raheel: I have a very, very good memory (the Emperor never forgets) and I can't see any changes on that page other than some updates of content. As far as I can tell you have addressed none of my comments (including the one about encoding) and all my previous comments still stand. I'm sure people who haven't yet reviewed your site might want to throw their thoughts in (although if you have done nothing with the previous reviews they might wonder why they should bother) but any further review from me would just involve me repeating myself.

I would suggest that before people add a review they read the previous thread to make sure they aren't covering something mentioned 6 months ago.

___________________
Emps

FAQs: Emperor

oh i see...
the prob is that i posted this thread with the link of brinkster which was where the previous site was uploaded... n the new pages werent published cause of the monthly bandwidth transfer limit

well i got a new host but its not up yet so the redirection isnt working... as far as micheal n emperor hmmm.... cmon guys... i bet u will see the difference... n i even did the encoding thing...

the new link, though not working yet, would be;
http://www.raheelistic.vze.com


n yeah, be urself with ur replies...

dA 1 n' oNLe,
raheel

http://www.raheelism.vze.com

oh i see...
the prob is that i posted this thread with the link of brinkster which was where the previous site was uploaded... n the new pages werent published cause of the monthly bandwidth transfer limit

well i got a new host but its not up yet so the redirection isnt working... as far as micheal n emperor hmmm.... cmon guys... i bet u will see the difference... n i even did the encoding thing...

the new link, though not working yet, would be;
http://www.raheelistic.vze.com


n yeah, thanx for the replies all great ppl went through criticism at their time jj.... lolz...

dA 1 n' oNLe,
raheel

http://www.raheelism.vze.com

oh i see...
the prob is that i posted this thread with the link of brinkster which was where the previous site was uploaded... n the new pages werent published cause of the monthly bandwidth transfer limit

well i got a new host but its not up yet so the redirection isnt working... as far as micheal n emperor hmmm.... cmon guys... i bet u will see the difference... n i even did the encoding thing...

the new link, though not working yet, would be;
http://www.raheelistic.vze.com


n yeah, thanx for the replies all great ppl went through criticism at their time jj.... lolz...

dA 1 n' oNLe,
raheel

http://www.raheelism.vze.com

oh i see...
the prob is that i posted this thread with the link of brinkster which was where the previous site was uploaded... n the new pages werent published cause of the monthly bandwidth transfer limit

well i got a new host but its not up yet so the redirection isnt working... as far as micheal n emperor hmmm.... cmon guys... i bet u will see the difference... n i even did the encoding thing...

the new link, though not working yet, would be;
http://www.raheelistic.vze.com


n yeah, thanx for the replies all great ppl went through criticism at their time jj.... lolz...

dA 1 n' oNLe,
raheel

http://www.raheelism.vze.com

4 repeat posts?...
I think that's a new record.
Not one I'd be all too happy about holding.
heh.

some guys over here are really too critical... huh.... ever had to say something good about ne1 micheal??? a real psychotic n omg u r living upto it

4 repeat posts were cause of some script error that the board had with its CGI... nevermind u seem to need nething to be neagtive about...

dA 1 n' oNLe,
raheel

http://www.raheelism.vze.com

raheel: There is no call for that.

As far as I can tell from your explanation you put your site up for review and put a link in to the old site - how exactly were you expecting a review of your latest site?

I'm going to shut this thread down and I'd recommend you only start a thread for a site review when you have a site to review. I'll leave it open for a bit in case I've misunderstood.

___________________
Emps

FAQs: Emperor

quote:

---

4 repeat posts were cause of some script error that the board had with its CGI

---

No, 4 repeat posts were because you impatiently hit the submit button 4 times rather than wait for it to do what it needed to do. =)

And uh, don't try to sum up michael's personality just because you happen to require on of his more negative responses.

That reflects on *you*, not him.

OK, is it just me, but is that "new" link you posted in your four (4) identical posts up above the same exact link that is in your first post? And is it not the same exact site that we looked at last time? What exactly did you change? Be specific here, please.

Emps is right. You have not addressed any of the concerns we had with the original page (for all I know, this is the original page). I don't really see why you're back here asking for further review when you haven't even implemented suggestions from the first review.

And ditto what DL said.





www.liminality.org

Read the review I gave your original site. I think you will find my review hasn't changed at all... just like your new site. And I'm still wanting to know why you want the opinions of a bunch of infidels anyway

As my first visit to your site, My opinions are fresh and have not been staind by memorys so here are my honest thoughts:

Main Page

The general colors are nice but resemble the theme of Holloween just slightly too much.

The links at the top of the page are well placed out, Seperated with a constant retainment of the design.

The Search box is used in a unique area of the site, I like where it is placed.

I find the logo while getting the point over, Is slightly too small.

Moving down the page and to the left is the vanigation. I find it rather organized, and funtional. I enjoy the added Mouse Over effect.

Slowly moving to the right I find it a cluttered mess, Nothing personal. While containing a uniqueness to it, It creates a problem for understanding.

Sub-Pages

Moving on to the Downloads // Music page, I find that the general layout is effective, funtional, and works with the site in general. I would however like to see the links for the download part working.

I find most of your sub-pages follow the same design so...


In Conclusion

A well designed website, Funtional and Unique. :highfive:



----------------
So what if I am clinicly insane, Does that mean I am a danger to what is known as socieity? Wait it does...

Regards,
Thaadeous Edward Ozone