OZONE Asylum
Forums
Site reviews!
my page
This page's ID:
10490
Search
QuickChanges
Forums
FAQ
Archives
Register
Edit Post
Who can edit a post?
The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
Remember Me On This Computer
Your Text:
Insert Slimies »
Insert UBB Code »
Close
Last Tag
|
All Tags
UBB Help
Cameron - Regarding icons, they do not have the same format. Remember an icon file can actually have more than just one (remember some icons show a different image at 16x16 than at 32x32). Sure for the actual birtmap for each icon, they do have a quite similar stryucture than a bmp (same goes for cursors). A couple of links regarding it: [url=http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vccore98/HTML/_core_icons_and_cursors.asp]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vccore98/HTML/_core_icons_and_cursors.asp[/url] [url=http://www.iconolog.net/info/icoFormat.html]http://www.iconolog.net/info/icoFormat.html[/url] [url=http://www.sover.net/~bassltd/icon.html]http://www.sover.net/~bassltd/icon.html[/url] <- old as hell, though Abotu the compression, I think i read somewhere it uses the same type than png does. I may be wrong tho. Regarding photopaint: PS is indeed better regarding the options it has. Photopaint 9 has several bugs that piss me off hardtime actually (alpha channels dissapear magically when you load one of them and then make a layer mask, when you undo a slight change on text layers, they can suddendly rasterize for not reason at all (thus making text editing impossible and forcing me to rewrite what i did :(), and some layer parts can be copied to another layer for random ocassions). Ironically version 8 lacks any of these bugs. The reasons i prefer Photopaint over PS are the following: -Opens waaaaay faster than ps, which is extremely important to me, being in a somewhat old comp, and whenever i need to make a minimal change. -Customizable workspace and shortcuts. I can add or remove menus and bars i need (or dont need), and set them wherever i need. Having shortcutted almost every common task is very wubable :P -It does have the most commons tools PS already has (layer, layer mask, filters, curves, color adjusments, movie maker, etc), and taht being summed with point number one, is good for me. -I can get the whole Corel Draw suite for free thanks to my uncle :D (but quiet you). PS obiously has some other stuff (like more layer properties), but *I* hardly use them in real life stuff. Kazroot - I still can see your use of CSS is almost zero to none. Most of your background properties could be easily be set on your CSS, and your use of tables for the design is sooo 1998 :D. there is a lot of tuts around explaining a css layout that can be handier whenrver you feel like making a new layout (you wont have to rewrite like 30 html pages!). The color scheme is simple, but not a good simple. Sometimes when checking the site i feel tyhere is a big void around, waaaaay tooo much black, IMHO. I dont see the need of a sitemap, as your site is not quite large (in sections), and its understnadable organized i doubt anyone will get lost. Btw, IrfanView is a free app that has support for many images types, and let you save icons with even 8-bit transparency. Good image viewer, and opens even faster than Notepad :P __________________________________ [img]http://invis.free.anonymizer.com/http://alevice.0catch.com/nonibeetle25sml2.gif[/img] [url=http://faq.ozoneasylum.com/1176]Sexy Demoness cel[/url]
Loading...
Options:
Enable Slimies
Enable Linkwords
« Backwards
—
Onwards »