Topic: frames |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: New York City |
posted 03-24-2001 18:45
OK, I wasn't sure where this post would fit in, but considering that a typical discussion involving FRAMES would include someone mentioning its cross-browser problems. . . .this seems like a good spot. |
Neurotic (0) Inmate Newly admitted Neurotic (0) Inmate Newly admitted |
posted 03-24-2001 19:54
i am told that search engines cant properly parse frames pages. lynx doesnt support frames pages, and im not sure how browsers for the blind deal with them... |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: New York City |
posted 03-24-2001 21:26
Thanks la'dsasha |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 03-25-2001 06:54
w3m is a text browser with support for frames (it converts them to tables)... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Solitary confinement |
posted 03-25-2001 16:28
I believe it is acceptable to design with frames (personally i don't) as long as you give the user a way out of them. "Click here for non-frames version" or a splash page with a choice. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: other places |
posted 03-27-2001 06:10
I seem to be the lone defender of the antiframe way at my shop. The only Ace I have left in my hand is that frame sites puke when you print them, and worse, they puke different in every browser (including every IE). |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 03-27-2001 16:56
I like frames. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 03-27-2001 17:07 |