OZONE Asylum
Forums
XML - XSL - XSLT - XHTML - CSS - DOM
XML - XSL - XSLT - XHTML - CSS - DOM
This page's ID:
10652
Search
QuickChanges
Forums
FAQ
Archives
Register
Edit Post
Who can edit a post?
The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
Remember Me On This Computer
Your Text:
Insert Slimies »
Insert UBB Code »
Close
Last Tag
|
All Tags
UBB Help
Arr, yeah I guess I sould have waited longer... Thanks for that bit of info slime. So what are we actualy thinking about changing or adding? From what I can gather this involves the following three forum: DHTML/Javascript Site Reviews All Browsers Suck Yet the Doc doesn't want to add any more topics to the DHTML/Javascript forum as it already drawns quite a bit of traffic. The site reviews forum has a moderate ammount of traffic and serves it's pourpose almost to letter at the moment. However there often seems to be the odd general site design question there every now and then. So I suppose the Site Reviews forum would be the best place to discuss general design philosophy as well as getting a seering review. Emp's idea of rolling the "All Browsers Suck" related question into the Site reviews also makes a lot of sence. Espicaly in regards to questions about why your site won't validate and other annoying browser related quirks. Maybe there's a possible name change on the table for that forum too? I'm still not sure which would be the best why to go with the XML & CSS related areas though. Slime and Doc both put forward very valid points to support very different approaches. The problem with XML is that it doesn't fit into the current forumla of splitting things up the way we have here for so long. It's both Server & Client. Both raw data and presentation. Well, it was created to be as versatile <-sp? as possible and it is. Which makes it hard to classify. Although XML is primarly client side the current lack of client side support means that XML phrasing and transforming should be done on the serverside for the time being. However, phrasing and transforming XML is such is small part of it really, and further down the track these will be done clientside. Eh, I'm still not really to sure what approach would be best. Still, either would good in my opinion. [url=http://www.dracusis.f2s.com] [img]http://www.whatever.net.au/~cameron/ozone/sig-dogtags-small2.gif[/img] [/url]
Loading...
Options:
Enable Slimies
Enable Linkwords
« Backwards
—
Onwards »