OZONE Asylum
Forums
XML - XSL - XSLT - XHTML - CSS - DOM
Validating my pages?? (good laughter)
This page's ID:
10676
Search
QuickChanges
Forums
FAQ
Archives
Register
Edit Post
Who can edit a post?
The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
Remember Me On This Computer
Your Text:
Insert Slimies »
Insert UBB Code »
Close
Last Tag
|
All Tags
UBB Help
Grmph... Donkey got a hard head. Hard as a stone. I read something about AppML at W3schools, W3schools rocks, but AppML sucks. The whole wapod structure, again, does exactly what AppML would like to: with an internal system, we got "virtual file types", that is, we can store php, html, but also popup objects, javaPopup objects, etc.. And index.php will react differently depending on the "pseudo file type". index.php embeds layout and all interface elements, our wapod db defines structure, contents, and an additional property (in the db, an enum field) lets us define how we want our content to be parsed. So I can change interface without touching the data, I can change data without touching the interface... I could (and will) even have a Flash frontdoor, a Java frontdoor, an XHTML strict frontdoor, then an HTML 4 strict frontdoor, a DHTML front, whatever.. All separated and independent from the contents, and the way the contents is interpreted. Then, at [url=http://www.w3schools.org,]www.w3schools.org,[/url] I tried to validate the page I was reading for XHTML 1 transitional. Everything worked fine. I tried to validate for XHTML 1 strict and got plenty of mistakes. Tried the same with HTML 4 strict, and got plenty of errors. So who's talking about standards? The day all browser constructors got a straight guideline to follow for browsers, or 1 billion charges if they don't, I will believe it is a standard. Meanwhile, I'll practise, just in case..
Loading...
Options:
Enable Slimies
Enable Linkwords
« Backwards
—
Onwards »