Topic: Problem with CSS and Redoign a Site |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 08-20-2002 18:54
The current site is sitting here: http://www.stonybrook.edu/stuaff/handbook/ |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Cell 666 |
posted 08-20-2002 19:20
yes, I remember Michael and I having problems with getting the height of something to fill 100%... I don't believe we found a solution to it I know that if you said height="100%" in a table it would work, but you can't use tables I guess. If I find anything I'll be sure to post it - hopefully someone else here has some actual solution. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Berlin (almost) |
posted 08-20-2002 19:31
Yeah, some of these things that can be done so easily with a table can be really hard to reproduce with CSS only. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 08-20-2002 22:28
kuckus: The idea for an additional container works... I wanted to find a way around this, but I guess that is not possible. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-20-2002 22:33
seems to me the width 100% part is your problem with #centerContainer |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-20-2002 22:48
Oh no... an absolutely positioned top menu too. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 08-20-2002 22:50 |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 08-20-2002 22:55 |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-21-2002 00:11
Take a look here --> sweetastic.com/ozone/stony.html |
Bipolar (III) Mad Scientist From: Eastbourne, UK. |
posted 08-21-2002 00:29
Nice one genis, that looks great.... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-21-2002 03:49
Thanks Phil! |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 08-21-2002 05:21 |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-21-2002 21:09
Where's my props from WarMage? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 08-22-2002 15:48
you get mad props. I implemented your ideas. They worked well. There is a lot there I don't understand the reasoning behind, such as using 0 0 0 0; instead of 0px; or even 0px 0px 0px 0px; there were a couple of errors, however the code is much more usable and compact now. Thanks a lot. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-22-2002 23:30
From that description I'd think you lived in College Station at my old apartment complex. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 08-23-2002 00:56
Yep, college station it is. At Stony Brook I am one of three webmasters over 12 website sections (1 site per area of student affairs). The number of sites keeps growing as each department becomes more aware of us and the capabilities of the web. So we run some 300 to 400 pages right now between 3 of us, using just HTML and a little HTML which we hacked into the server via the .htaccess. |