This stupid CSS sheet is redundant, right? — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 10809

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	what i was saying is do you need to repeatedly redefine? Like this, say I define the <a> tag like this: a, a.link { color: blue; text-decoration: none; } a.visited { color: purple; text-decoration: none; } a.hover { color: #0033ff; text-decoration: underline; } ***Then, I have a section header, that may* sometimes contain a link in it: .sectionhead { font-family: Verdana; font-size: 13pt; } ****now, unless I want to make sure that this always stays the same appearance and color and text-decoration, do i need to define .sectionhead a, .sectionhead a:link, .sectionhead a:hover etc??? I mean, wouldn't this* be useless: .sectionhead a:link { color: blue; text-decoration: none; } since it's the same exact thing as the definition in a.link in the first place????? that's all :) [url=http://www.drisson.com/] [img]http://www.drisson.com/sig.gif[/img] [/url] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post