Topic: flash5..actionscript or not??? |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: jax, fl usa |
posted 05-28-2001 02:51
hey peeps, |
Neurotic (0) Inmate Newly admitted Neurotic (0) Inmate Newly admitted |
posted 05-28-2001 04:42
Hey Brad... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Mi, USA |
posted 05-28-2001 04:49
*sprinkles fairy dust* flash (cuse pun) and the thread magically moved to the multimedia forum |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA |
posted 05-28-2001 04:54
Jeeze you mad scientists are fast. Or I'm slow. In the time it took me to write an answer the question had poofed here! Oh well, here's what I wrote: |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: jax, fl usa |
posted 05-28-2001 05:15
thanks for the info... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA |
posted 05-28-2001 13:53
A given amount of data is going to take a given amount of time to crawl across the 'net regardless of what software you use. Images that size take up space. No magic. Only problem with planting them in a Flash movies is that they essentially all have to load at once. If you had a convetinal, let's say JavaScript, gallery, you would have to wait to see each image, so the wait is spread out in little chunks. If you putt them all into a Flash movie, the wait is all up front. |