Topic: Initiative on deleting/closing threads (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 02-19-2004 23:23
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 02-19-2004 23:30
InI - As far as the closing or deletion of threads are concerned I generally let things run their course. If a topic is growing long but its still active, I usually wait to close it and create a new one. Usually, a member will realize its getting long and create a second thread. To avoid confusion I'll close the original thread and direct traffic to the new one. In cases of utter nonsense - not really related to Philosophy - such as flame wars and Zigot_Bahn's posts, I tend to close them. I also lean towards deletion. I don't believe we should waste Doc's bandwith with these posts. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Jacks raging bile duct.... |
posted 02-20-2004 17:35
as far as closing threads goes IMHO I think that if a thread is malicious or if several of the other inmates are offended by the content then we as moderators should move to close it...I'm all for freedom of speech until people start getting hurt...so to speak... |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Germany |
posted 02-20-2004 21:01
we should remind ourselves that closing a thread is no big deal. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 02-20-2004 21:43
My thought has always been, like TP's, that if a thread is closed that should not have been, there are plenty of people around who can reopen it. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 02-21-2004 01:56
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 02-22-2004 23:31
If you're involved in a heated debate its probably better to leave it to another moderator to close. You can hit us up on Q or email if you have a problem. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS |
posted 02-24-2004 15:56
Then there's also the choice not to click the link to enter a thread. If you know that stuff is going on inside a thread that's going to tick you off, why not just avoid the thread altogether? Let it run its course and someone else will close/archive/delete it. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 02-25-2004 14:48
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 02-26-2004 17:34
I'm not sure that I actually approved anything - I asked for clarification as I wasn't sure what was going on. The fact that I received none might be taken as a sign of...... something. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
posted 02-27-2004 16:14
I dunno... I'm generally against closing any thread unless something truely stupid is going on such as spam or serial numbers or such, but generally the thread wouldn't pop up top if people weren't replying to it... and if peope are replying to it.. let it be... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Happy Hunting Grounds... |
posted 03-09-2004 14:54
This happened to me. I don't close threads anymore, that I am personally involved in. Either let another do it, or leave it open. Eventually, as is with all threads, it will die...and then can be closed, deleted, archived, whatever... |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 03-09-2004 15:03
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 03-09-2004 16:36
|
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Somewhere over the rainbow |
posted 03-09-2004 17:55
The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action. |