Topic awaiting preservation: Hiroshima and Baghdad $Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=13908" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: Hiroshima and Baghdad" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: Hiroshima and Baghdad\$

Author	Thread
ramsaydesigns Bipolar (III) Inmate From: The Mountains Insane since: Jul 2002	posted 08-07-2002 07:32 <BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> Hiroshima and Baghdad By Lowell Ponte FrontPageMagazine.com
WebShaman Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001	posted 08-07-2002 16:09 This link http://www.glocom.org/media_reviews/w_review/20020805_weekly_review59/ does support the Japanese nuke stuff...so I guess there is some basis there in fact. One does wonder, however (as the Auther points out) on the Timing of the press release... For one who has worked in the Intelligence community, this is suspect. Things like this don't just happen 'coincidentally'. The question is, who really released this stuff, and why? And what did they hope to gain by doing so? Interesting... As for Saddam...and the 'building' signs of The Gulf War, revisited, well, first of all, it doesn't surprise me that it's being considered. The real reasons for such a thing are hard to discern...and without 'inside' information, difficult at best to base an opinion on. I think the question has been pretty much 'discussed to death' in the current thread on the topic.

Topic awaiting preservation: Hiroshima and Baghdad\$

Author

Thread

ramsaydesigns
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: The Mountains
Insane since: Jul 2002

posted 08-07-2002 07:32

<BLOCKQUOTE><FONT face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
Hiroshima and Baghdad
By Lowell Ponte
FrontPageMagazine.com

WebShaman
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: Happy Hunting Grounds...
Insane since: Mar 2001

posted 08-07-2002 16:09

This link http://www.glocom.org/media_reviews/w_review/20020805_weekly_review59/ does support the Japanese nuke stuff...so I guess there is some basis there in fact. One does wonder, however (as the Auther points out) on the Timing of the press release...

For one who has worked in the Intelligence community, this is suspect. Things like this don't just happen 'coincidentally'. The question is, who really released this stuff, and why? And what did they hope to gain by doing so? Interesting...

As for Saddam...and the 'building' signs of The Gulf War, revisited, well, first of all, it doesn't surprise me that it's being considered. The real reasons for such a thing are hard to discern...and without 'inside' information, difficult at best to base an opinion on. I think the question has been pretty much 'discussed to death' in the current thread on the topic.