Preserved Topic: TV Tuner, which one is better? |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: |
posted 07-11-2001 05:18
I just bough ATI tv-wonder USB the $99 one, it has S-Video, composite and RF input, which is cool, but the uncool thing is that, the image color seem... hmmm, what's the word, it's like when displaying a 32-Bit based image with 256 color, so there are big squred pixels. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 07-11-2001 10:05 |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: New Jersey, USA |
posted 07-11-2001 13:32
LMAO mr. maX |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 07-11-2001 14:51
yeah...I'd say I prefer a real tv |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Toronto, ON, Canada |
posted 07-11-2001 18:09
They're all about the same. Keep in mind that a computer monitor is much higher resolution (usually) than a tv signal typically puts out. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: |
posted 07-12-2001 01:40
space !!! |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 07-12-2001 07:52 |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Omicron Persei 8 |
posted 07-12-2001 09:03 |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia |
posted 07-12-2001 09:44
The quality, which you can get from those cheap TV/capture cards is not very good (especially frame rate). You would need to have a semi-professional Miro product if you want to talk about video capture... |