Preserved Topic: The best picture of the big bang so far

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

It's possible that there's a problem with our physics that restricts us to our 380,000 years barrier. I don't think scientists are willing to think up a new theory to overcome this restriction though any time soon nor do I think they will ever be willing. :? Now if I'm not mistaken, 380,000 years less than 13.7 billion years is still quite old. I don't think the word 'infant' is accurate.

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

Of course, actually reading the article would have cleared that up *sigh*

It is interesting...and offers observational support for some models. Amazing is, that the WMAP is so small...coolness.

It's late. I read the article. I missed it. *sigh* It's 3:40AM. Give me a break, Shaman.

Hey Welcome Back Morgan Ramsay.

quote:

---

The new measurements even shed light on the nature of the dark energy, which acts as a sort of an anti-gravity.

---

Mmmmmm anti-gravity *drool*
Wonder if we could ever harness its powers and use it as the basis for an interstellar drive?

What really got me was that the universe is made up of only 4% atoms (ordinary matter) - it makes our existance seem all the more remarkable.

Miraculous even.

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

Agreed, but the stuff we're made from presumably comes out of that 4%, and when you consider there's Mineral/Gaeseous/Organic/Other matter (there's bucket loads of 'ordinary' stuff in the universe), how much is left for the creation of Intelligent life = ?% (tiny)

I'm happy to accept that our very being is nothing short of extraordinary.

I'm curious about this 73% - mysterious dark energy.
Sounds like the contents of Darth Sidious' underwear!

Sounds like the contents of my underwear.

^ Now that I didn't want to know

You can join ranks with SB...

Unkown type of dark matter. Dark matter in the strictist term as by astronomy, is simply matter that cant be seen. Like behind something, or not lit, or for whatever reason cant be accounted for.

I'm more interested in gravity generators not anti-gravity. Imagine the kind of home gyms we can create. Just walk into a room, turn on high-gravity, and move! I think I saw a Dragon Ball Z episode awhile ago that had Goku training in high-gravity. I think he flipped the switch up to like 14Gs. Then he got stuck! LOL

quote:

---

The man described by Excentrica Galumbits, the Triple-Breasted whore of Eroticon 6, as the best bang since the big one...

---

Oh no, WebShaman! This thread has no purpose anymore. Close!

Now, MR, this is the second time I've seen your crap...take it to mail, hear?

As for your comment on 'super-gravity', that already exists - it's called a centerfuge...and they are currently being used, to test conditions in humans that are subjected to heavy gravities (to get an idea of how the take-offs affect the body, etc.).

Really? That's beautiful music to my ears.


Oh, and I did take it to e-mail... I took it to Kevin.

My name is not Kevin. If you got a personal problem, to the way I do things, then take it to mail. If you keep posting such drivel, I'll delete it from here on. Is that clear? Behave, have fun, whatever. In that regards, I don't particularly care. But if you start fucking with other peoples threads, just to post something personal to me (because you're not happy with the way I do things), that's where I draw the line.

Now, can we continue the topic?

BTW, I'm well aquainted with the Doc's name...however, you don't have a problem with the Doc here...apparently, you have one with me. So, take it to mail. Taking it to mail with the Doc, is not helping your situation unless you stop this inane posting spree.

[This message has been edited by WebShaman (edited 02-17-2003).]

Oh, you didn't know? DocOzone's name is Kevin.

Grow up and act your age you twit.

Thanks for sharing InI.

[This message has been edited by Dracusis (edited 02-17-2003).]

I've already stopped this "inane posting spree." I agree with you that it was childish and immature. But really... it was just STUPID and MORONIC of you to close my thread.

Take it to mail...for the last time. And any Mad Scientist could open it again.

Can we continue with the topic in question now? Thank you.