Preserved Topic: problem with javascript on netscape4.78 $Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=18506" title="Pages that link to Preserved Topic: problem with javascript on netscape4.78" rel="nofollow" >Preserved Topic: problem with javascript on netscape4.78\$

Author	Thread
wr22 Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: Insane since: Sep 2001	posted 09-15-2001 10:36 Hi all, I've got a small javascript problem. In the following piece of code: code: <HTML> <HEAD> <style type="text/css"> table.next { position: absolute; top:15px; left: 120px; } </style> </HEAD> <BODY> <table> <tr><td><img name="img1" src="image1.gif"></td></tr> <tr><td><img name="img2" src="image2.gif"></td></tr> </table> <table class="next"> <tr><td><img name="img3" src="image3.gif"></td></tr> <tr><td><img name="img4" src="image4.gif"></td></tr> </table> <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"> alert( "test" ); alert( "img3 defined? " + document.images['img3'].src ); </script> </BODY> </HTML> the second alert msg doesn't show up on Netscape4.78 (It does work on IE and Netscape6) Somehow img3 doesn't get defined. If I remove the 'class="next"' part of the 2nd table declaration, everything works well. Has anyone seen anything like this? Is this a well-known netscape4.78 bug? Is there a work-around or something? I appreciate your help. Thanx in advance. -wr22
mr.maX Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Belgrade, Serbia Insane since: Sep 2000	posted 09-15-2001 14:54 Shitscape will treat your second table as layer and therefore won't be able to access images in it by using only document.images... Anyway, to make it work modify second <table> tag to look like this: <table class="next" id="next"> And use the following JS code: alert( "img3 defined? " + (document.layers ? document.layers['next'].document.images['img3'].src : document.images['img3'].src) ); Enjoy!
Osaires Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: oslo, Norway Insane since: Aug 2001	posted 09-15-2001 15:15 welcome wr22
wr22 Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate From: Insane since: Sep 2001	posted 09-15-2001 21:57 I knew I would get an answer here... Thank you, mr.maX and Osaires -wr22

Preserved Topic: problem with javascript on netscape4.78\$

Author

Thread

wr22
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate

From:
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted 09-15-2001 10:36

Hi all,

I've got a small javascript problem.
In the following piece of code:

code:

<HTML>

<HEAD>

<style type="text/css"> 

table.next { position: absolute; top:15px; left: 120px; }

</style>

</HEAD>



<BODY>

<table>

 <tr><td><img name="img1" src="image1.gif"></td></tr>

 <tr><td><img name="img2" src="image2.gif"></td></tr>

</table>

<table class="next">

 <tr><td><img name="img3" src="image3.gif"></td></tr>

 <tr><td><img name="img4" src="image4.gif"></td></tr>

</table>



<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">

 alert( "test" );

 alert( "img3 defined?  " + document.images['img3'].src );

</script>



</BODY>

</HTML>

the second alert msg doesn't show up on Netscape4.78 (It does work on IE and Netscape6)
Somehow img3 doesn't get defined.
If I remove the 'class="next"' part of the 2nd table declaration, everything works well.
Has anyone seen anything like this? Is this a well-known netscape4.78 bug?
Is there a work-around or something?
I appreciate your help.

Thanx in advance.

-wr22

mr.maX
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist

From: Belgrade, Serbia
Insane since: Sep 2000

posted 09-15-2001 14:54

Shitscape will treat your second table as layer and therefore won't be able to access images in it by using only document.images... Anyway, to make it work modify second <table> tag to look like this:

<table class="next" id="next">

And use the following JS code:

alert( "img3 defined? " + (document.layers ? document.layers['next'].document.images['img3'].src : document.images['img3'].src) );

Enjoy!

Osaires
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: oslo, Norway
Insane since: Aug 2001

posted 09-15-2001 15:15

welcome wr22

wr22
Obsessive-Compulsive (I) Inmate

From:
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted 09-15-2001 21:57

I knew I would get an answer here...
Thank you, mr.maX and Osaires

-wr22