Topic: My Latest Project: www.ultimateimage.us |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Phoenix |
posted 08-12-2004 00:49
Let me know what you think: |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: few miles outside philly |
posted 08-12-2004 04:50
I see you don't care how us FireFox people view your page. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Phoenix |
posted 08-13-2004 09:02
I used absolute positioning and normal positioning with CSS. Here is the CSS: |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: there...no..there..... |
posted 08-13-2004 22:42
css positioning + tables = bad results |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Rochester, New York, USA |
posted 08-14-2004 04:50
Firefox choked on WinXP, which means that mozilla and netscape browser are going to most likely eat it too. I don't think that I am going to test this and give a review until you get the cross browser stuff worked out. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Phoenix |
posted 08-14-2004 23:33
WarMage: Thanks for the info... I'm not sure where to begin on determining what is NOT cross browser friendly. Any ideas there? |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Phoenix |
posted 10-18-2004 05:01
Help please... |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: the dark one with no windows |
posted 10-18-2004 07:00
quote:
|
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Solitary confinement |
posted 10-18-2004 18:46
I agree with cprompt: |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Phoenix |
posted 10-19-2004 06:02
I think if you look into the code further, you will find that the stuff that requires the browser compatability fix is strictly DIV + CSS. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Phoenix |
posted 10-20-2004 07:25
I'm closer! I'm using Firefox, so don't exactly know how it looks on a MAC but am hoping it is better. Can someone please check? |