Topic: The interpretation of height: 100% |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
posted 09-19-2004 17:34
Now, I know IE interprets this the way I'm looking for, by making the element's height 100% fo its containing element, but do I have it wrong and this is not, in fact, the way it's supposed to be interpreted? When I set the height of a div to 100% in firefox it only shows as much of my DIV as there is content. Is this the way it's supposed to be? If so, any idea how I'd make said DIV cover the page and not just as much of it as has content? |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Beyond that line... |
posted 09-19-2004 18:09
A link or image would help you know. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 09-20-2004 00:44
If you're in quirks mode and setting a table's height attribute to 100% there's no problem. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-20-2004 00:53 |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
posted 09-20-2004 09:14
templar654: I'm not looking for people ot fix my code for me. if I were, I now have webspace so I would have put it online and asked for help on that. All I want to know is how the various browsers interpret height: 100% and am explaining how I came ot be askiung such a question. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 09-21-2004 00:53
dl's exactly correct there but I wanted to mention before you got too far off on a weird tangent, that you can fake a 100% column by using a background-image for the body that tiles all the way down if that's what you're trying to do. Otherwise you'll be limited to 100% of the broswer's initial "live area". |