OZONE Asylum
Forums
XML - XSL - XSLT - XHTML - CSS - DOM
Absolute position DIVs in DIVs
This page's ID:
24026
Search
QuickChanges
Forums
FAQ
Archives
Register
Edit Post
Who can edit a post?
The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
Remember Me On This Computer
Your Text:
Insert Slimies »
Insert UBB Code »
Close
Last Tag
|
All Tags
UBB Help
Heh, that page is for testing how your browser manages. But I guess the summary is as such: (Note that this does not test for other interactions, such as floats.) Opera: Gets positioning perfectly except for a bug with absolute positioning inside fixed positioned elements. Safari: Gets everything correct except for absolute positioning when there is no positioned parent, but is a border on the root element. Mozilla: Like Safari, with note that fixed positioning makes scrolling jumpy, especially if oyu are using transparency or alpha channels in the background. MSN/OSX: See Safari Ie5m: Didn't bother. Ie5.0w: Gets static right. Ie5.5w: Gets the box model wrong, but both relative and static are right, and absolute is right under the circumstance that the parent is either absolutely or relatively positioned. Ie6.0w in quirks mode: See ie5.5w. Ie6.0w in standards mode: Same as in quirks mode, but gets box model right. And to sum it up: - Absolute positioning within relative or absolute positioning is reliably supported. - Relative positioning is even more solidly supported. - Every browser gets static right... (back to nn2 at least...) -- var Liorean = { prototype: [sigrotate]JavaScript|XML|XHTML|HTML|CSS|ProgrammingTheory[/sigrotate]Guru.prototype, abode: "[sigrotate][url]http://liorean.web-graphics.com/[/url]|[url]http://codingforums.com/[/url]|[url]http://web-graphics.com/[/url][/sigrotate]", profile: "[url]http://codingforums.com/member.php?u=5798[/url]"};
Loading...
Options:
Enable Slimies
Enable Linkwords
« Backwards
—
Onwards »