Topic awaiting preservation: resizing a massive AI to export as TIF |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 02-04-2005 19:20
I have a problem spawned from complete ignorance.... I've built some Illustrator files, mostly vector stuff, each piece has *1* placed raster image (PSDs) and the physical dimensions are roughly 10 feet by 3.5 feet (3x1 meters). Of course Illustrator will have nothing to do with exporting these files as a TIF (or apparently any other bitmap type format) file. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Adanac |
posted 02-04-2005 23:36
You might be able to export the tif at a lower resolution with anti-alias off , but of course the detail won't be there. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 02-04-2005 23:44
the viewing distance could be in your face to across an exhibit hall, it's a tradeshow booth wall (4 banners at 3x1 meters each), anyone visiting the booth could get a peak up close so it should be all it can be I guess |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Adanac |
posted 02-05-2005 00:01
Don't understand why he can't rip these, seems like a simple print job to a 48" wide camjet or such wideformat printer. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 02-05-2005 01:11
yeah, if worse comes to worse I can rebuild the files, however that's precisely what I'm trying to avoid! They're not that complicated but still, do overs is do overs and that's somehow admitting defeat isn't it?! |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Den Haag: The Royal Residence |
posted 02-05-2005 11:43
Jason what resolution of the underlaying psd are we talking about? If this thing is printed on an inkjet printer anything more as 300dpi not needed. Even in an commercial setup an 48" inkjet is still an inkjet. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Madison, Indiana, USA |
posted 02-05-2005 18:33
Jason, |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 02-05-2005 20:40 |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Houston, TX, USA |
posted 02-17-2005 18:46
didnt see this til now, i'm curious what the outcome was JK? the fact that these are at 300dpi seems really high res imo, i'd imagine you could do them at 150dpi with no concern for quality loss at that viewing distance. not that this prob matters now |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah |
posted 02-17-2005 21:12
well I meant to get back as well but forgot, been super not around lately. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Den Haag: The Royal Residence |
posted 02-17-2005 23:56
Thumbs up |