Topic awaiting preservation: POVCOMP results are in $Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=25035" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: POVCOMP results are in" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: POVCOMP results are in\$

Author	Thread
Slime Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA Insane since: Mar 2000	posted 02-17-2005 07:27 Some amazing images! http://www.povcomp.com/entries/
mas Maniac (V) Mad Librarian From: the space between us Insane since: Sep 2002	posted 02-17-2005 10:04 hey i am missing your water picture, slime awesome images indeed! B \| T \| E \| P \| L
JKMabry Maniac (V) Inmate From: raht cheah Insane since: Aug 2000	posted 02-17-2005 17:32 very nice! Yours is partilcularly pleasing I must say, nice job.
GRUMBLE Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Omicron Persei 8 Insane since: Oct 2000	posted 02-17-2005 21:09 congrats Slime! all those leaves look like heavy macro madness to me. interesting that the radiosity pass only took 3 hours considering the big number of leaves. it also loos like you used additional light sources in the back? how many light sources all together?
Tyberius Prime Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Germany Insane since: Sep 2001	posted 02-17-2005 22:38 love the color combination in your's, Slime. I don't see why some made it up as far as they did. I mean, they're all decent renders, but I just don't see anything in some of them (but it might be me, my art education is still lacking), but what's in No 7. except for the sheer level of detail (which is probably much lower than in no. 2, especially due to the repetition)? So long, ->Tyberius Prime
Slime Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA Insane since: Mar 2000	posted 02-19-2005 19:27 Thanks guys. The radiosity pass was fairly quick because I used pretty low settings for it. Then I used high settings for the final pass, making the best use I could out of a relatively small number of samples. There's only one light source, but it lights up the whole scene, and the beams of light near the front may make it look like the back is illuminated. TP: I agree, for some images I wondered how they did as well as they did. But then, others have commented on some of those saying how much they liked them. So I guess it's just a personal preference.

Topic awaiting preservation: POVCOMP results are in\$

Author

Thread

Slime
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist

From: Massachusetts, USA
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted 02-17-2005 07:27

Some amazing images!

http://www.povcomp.com/entries/

mas
Maniac (V) Mad Librarian

From: the space between us
Insane since: Sep 2002

posted 02-17-2005 10:04

hey i am missing your water picture, slime
awesome images indeed!

B | T | E | P | L

JKMabry
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: raht cheah
Insane since: Aug 2000

posted 02-17-2005 17:32

very nice! Yours is partilcularly pleasing I must say, nice job.

GRUMBLE
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Omicron Persei 8
Insane since: Oct 2000

posted 02-17-2005 21:09

congrats Slime!

all those leaves look like heavy macro madness to me.
interesting that the radiosity pass only took 3 hours considering the big number of leaves.

it also loos like you used additional light sources in the back? how many light sources all together?

Tyberius Prime
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Germany
Insane since: Sep 2001

posted 02-17-2005 22:38

love the color combination in your's, Slime.

I don't see why some made it up as far as they did.
I mean, they're all decent renders, but I just don't see anything in some of them
(but it might be me, my art education is still lacking), but what's in No 7. except for the
sheer level of detail (which is probably much lower than in no. 2, especially due to the repetition)?

So long,

->Tyberius Prime

Slime
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist

From: Massachusetts, USA
Insane since: Mar 2000

posted 02-19-2005 19:27

Thanks guys.

The radiosity pass was fairly quick because I used pretty low settings for it. Then I used high settings for the final pass, making the best use I could out of a relatively small number of samples.

There's only one light source, but it lights up the whole scene, and the beams of light near the front may make it look like the back is illuminated.

TP: I agree, for some images I wondered how they did as well as they did. But then, others have commented on some of those saying how much they liked them. So I guess it's just a personal preference.