CoolPix 5700 or not? — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 25446

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	Depends on your needs and your budget. Personally I would not consider anything other than a DSLR. [quote] To make a long article simple, today's 8MP and other fixed lens digital cameras have electronic viewfinders that look like crummy 15 year old TVs, work so slowly they can't focus on anything unless it's holding still and generally are quite frustrating. By comparison the interchangeable lens true DSLRs have great optical viewfinders and immediate operation, just like film. The DSLRs also make much cleaner images than the P/S cameras. The only reason I see for getting an expensive P/S is smaller size. Unlike film P/S cameras, the digital ones are frustrating to use. Actually if you do want a tiny P/S I'd get a $500 one with a long zoom and image stabilization, like ones from Canon and Panasonic below. [/quote] http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/2dig.htm edit: for film I use a Nikon F2, Nikon N90S (F90x), for digital I use a Nikon D70 - can't afford anything better right now but the D70 is excellent although still expensive. [small](Edited by [internallink=25429]ZaddyDog[/internallink] on 04-07-2005 01:18)[/small] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post