Topic awaiting preservation: Little Bit of Help $Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=27067" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: Little Bit of Help" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: Little Bit of Help\$

Author	Thread
Sangreal Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: the Wal-mart Road Crew Insane since: Apr 2004	posted 11-29-2005 15:21 Alright, I could use some of your help. Debate class is doing a topic that, all though I have material on I would like a fresh look at and some outside views whether they are pro or con. I will get to the topic soon here but bear with me. Please post whether the point would be for Pro or Con, but only post serious and useful info, religous reasons must stay out. Heres the question: Should the United Nations lead the fight against terrorism worldwide? I need this by Dec. 1. Thanks. "God may have mad the world, but it's held together by duct tape"-quote found on internet
Arthemis Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Milky Way Insane since: Nov 2001	posted 12-02-2005 22:59 "terrorism": The calculated use of violence (or threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear "terrorism", expanded: The carefully thought out in advance use of acts of aggression (or threat of) against nonmilitary citizens, in order to gain, by this effort, goals that are, views about social relationships involving authority or power, or having or showing belief in and reverence for a deity, or concerned with or suggestive of ideas; this is done through imposing a feeling of discouragement, or compelling by force of authority, or teaching or impressing of fear upon the mind by frequent instruction or repetition. "lead the fight against terrorism worldwide": there's nothing or no one to lead, just something to fight against. And who the hell elected the US to be leaders anyway?

Topic awaiting preservation: Little Bit of Help\$

Author

Thread

Sangreal
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: the Wal-mart Road Crew
Insane since: Apr 2004

posted 11-29-2005 15:21

Alright, I could use some of your help. Debate class is doing a topic that, all though I have material on I would like a fresh look at and some outside views whether they are pro or con. I will get to the topic soon here but bear with me. Please post whether the point would be for Pro or Con, but only post serious and useful info, religous reasons must stay out. Heres the question:

Should the United Nations lead the fight against terrorism worldwide?
I need this by Dec. 1. Thanks.

"God may have mad the world, but it's held together by duct tape"-quote found on internet

Arthemis
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Milky Way
Insane since: Nov 2001

posted 12-02-2005 22:59

"terrorism": The calculated use of violence (or threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear

"terrorism", expanded: The carefully thought out in advance use of acts of aggression (or threat of) against nonmilitary citizens, in order to gain, by this effort, goals that are, views about social relationships involving authority or power, or having or showing belief in and reverence for a deity, or concerned with or suggestive of ideas; this is done through imposing a feeling of discouragement, or compelling by force of authority, or teaching or impressing of fear upon the mind by frequent instruction or repetition.

"lead the fight against terrorism worldwide": there's nothing or no one to lead, just something to fight against. And who the hell elected the US to be leaders anyway?