Forced Fatherhood — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

Philosophy and other Silliness

Forced Fatherhood

This page's ID: 27644

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	[quote][b]DL-44 said:[/b] Are you for real? You were the one talking about it... If I have some spare time, I'll take a look for which thread it was, if you think that will help....However, as I said above, I referred to what you said in THIS thread, and simply alluded to the fact that you have said the same before.[/quote] DL, you've gained my respect here at Ozone, so from now on I WILL take your word for it. I guess I found it a wee-bit tacky to debate an issue with what a person PREVIOUSLY mentioned without posting a link to it. Now I don't want to be a hypocrit here, so if that becomes an issue please post the link, but I will concur with you that I did say the SAME thing before in another thread. I just don't want to be hypocritical with my opinions/posts. Nuff said. [quote][b]Zynx said:[/b] I agree. And yet the cases I have personally witnessed, the man supports the majority of the total costs for the child, never the woman.[/quote] [quote][b]DL-44 said:[/b]But what are the circumstances of the custody arrangements, the involvement of the father, and the income of both parties?[/quote] OK, here goes; 1st partie = Custody: Mother first, Father second 2nd partie = Custody: Mother-Father = Equal/Share 1st partie = involvement: Mother first, Father second 2nd partie = involvement: Mother-Father = Equal/Share 1st partie = Income: Father first, Mother second 2nd partie = Income: Father first, Mother second [i]" 1st party; eventually the woman gave up parental rights, due to her lack of holding down a job, and an un-safe living enviornment. Father now has FULL parental rights.[/i] [i]2nd party; eventually they amicably split, and yet the Father now deals with TAX deductions, with a sharing of those deductions, to offset child support. Mother is completely understanding of the issue.[/i] [quote][b]Zynx said:[/b] why would you deny this man his day in court?[/quote] [quote][b]DL-44 said:[/b] I don't recall saying anything to that effect. I disagree with the premise of the lawsuit. I disagree with what seems to be a semi-pervasive view of a father's legal standing. I never said anything about denying anyone's right to argue a point, legally or otherwise.[/quote] DL, your disgusted with this lawsuit, so it was a valid QUESTION. I am not trying to put words in your mouth. But why is this lawsuit more disgusting, than the South Dakota debacle? Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

« Backwards — Onwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu