Topic: inches on ruler not as same as printed version (Page 1 of 1) Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=27742" title="Pages that link to Topic: inches on ruler not as same as printed version (Page 1 of 1)" rel="nofollow" >Topic: inches on ruler not as same as printed version <span class="small">(Page 1 of 1)</span>\

 
wcr one
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: seattle
Insane since: Mar 2001

posted posted 04-06-2006 20:25

Hey all,

I have noticed that when I print something out from PS or Illustrator that the printed size is different than what it should be (based on the PS ruler). does it have to do with res of my screen?

thanks

bill

zavaboy
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: f(x)
Insane since: Jun 2004

posted posted 04-07-2006 01:21

You need to use 72dpi for printing.

Wes
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Inside THE BOX
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 04-07-2006 04:51

He needs to do what now?

If the ruler in Photoshop is set to display inches, then it should reflect the print size of the image you're working on, based on that image's resolution. The resolution of your monitor has nothing to do with it.

For example, I have an image that's 8.5" by 6" at 300 ppi, as confirmed by Image Size:



The ruler reflects that size:



Therefore, that's what it should print at.

If these things look right to you and you're getting a different size on paper, the first thing I would check is that, when you print, there isn't something in the print dialog that's set to "resize to fit the page," or something along those lines. It may be in your particular printer's print settings.

DL-44
Lunatic (VI) Inmate

From: under the bed
Insane since: Feb 2000

posted posted 04-07-2006 05:00
quote:

Wes said:

the first thing I would check is that, when you print, there isn't something in the print dialog that's set to "resize to fit the page," or something along those lines. It may be in your particular printer's print settings.



Yep, first thing that came to mind for me.

quote:

zavaboy said:

You need to use 72dpi for printing.



Why on earth would you do that?

zavaboy
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: f(x)
Insane since: Jun 2004

posted posted 04-07-2006 05:44

I'm sorry... am I wrong? I allways thought 72dpi was for printing...

Suho1004
Maniac (V) Mad Librarian

From: Seoul, Korea
Insane since: Apr 2002

posted posted 04-07-2006 06:38

72 dpi is standard screen resolution. Images printed at screen resolution are going to come out looking pretty crappy.


___________________________
Suho: www.liminality.org | Cell 270 | Sig Rotator | the Fellowship of Sup

lan
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Darwin, NT, Australia
Insane since: Dec 2003

posted posted 04-07-2006 06:49

Doesn't really matter if you print at 1000 dpi, it's just a lot of dots (very small too) - an inch is still just an inch!
Eh guys

[sense] Organisation is anathema to organisations [/sense]

Suho1004
Maniac (V) Mad Librarian

From: Seoul, Korea
Insane since: Apr 2002

posted posted 04-07-2006 10:26
quote:

lan said:

Doesn't really matter if you print at 1000 dpi, it's just a lot of dots (very small too) - an inch is still just an inch!



True. The resolution is actually completely unrelated to the original problem. We were just trying to clear up zavaboy's confusion.


___________________________
Suho: www.liminality.org | Cell 270 | Sig Rotator | the Fellowship of Sup

kimson
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Royal Horsing Ground
Insane since: Jan 2005

posted posted 04-07-2006 12:06

Just to add my 2p, as nobody mentioned it, 150 dpi is conventionally a good enough print resolution for regular jobs (not professional printing).

DL-44
Lunatic (VI) Inmate

From: under the bed
Insane since: Feb 2000

posted posted 04-07-2006 13:48
quote:

lan said:

Doesn't really matter if you print at 1000 dpi, it's just a lot of dots (very small too) - an inch is still just an inch!



Depends how cold it is

quote:

zavaboy said:

I'm sorry... am I wrong? I allways thought 72dpi was for printing...


As alluded to above, you can print at any resolution your printer/software allows. What resolution to use depends on a number of things, including how large you are printing, what you are printing on, why you are printing, etc.
72 dpi is, generally speaking, far too low for good quality printing.

Wes
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Inside THE BOX
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 04-07-2006 15:38
quote:
150 dpi is conventionally a good enough print resolution for regular jobs



That's true; for most home printers, more than this won't get you much better quality. I always work at 300, however, as this is pretty standard for more professional jobs.

NoJive
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: The Land of one Headlight on.
Insane since: May 2001

posted posted 04-07-2006 15:57

And just to make things even murkier (sp?).... When it comes to printing aren't we supposed to be talking about LPI ....or at the very least be aware of your printers LPI ?

CPrompt
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: there...no..there.....
Insane since: May 2001

posted posted 04-09-2006 05:05
quote:

NoJive said:
aren't we supposed to be talking about LPI ....or at the very least be aware of your printers LPI ?



I had this exact problem with a customer just the other day. They were printing from Quark (I believe) and it was coming out all grainy.

Our printshop's don't like to get anything lower than 300dpi FWIW.

Later,

C:\

wcr one
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: seattle
Insane since: Mar 2001

posted posted 04-10-2006 19:20

that is what I thought too (as far as 1" should equal 1"). but I am printing photos (at 300) through whcc.com, a great company, and also a few things at home on my crappy little printer. some things have been photos (up to 20 x 30) and some have been logos and the like.

and I have sized it using the cropping tool with the size and resolution set.

hmmm, weird.

thanks for the input

lan
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Darwin, NT, Australia
Insane since: Dec 2003

posted posted 04-11-2006 07:21

wcr one, something is indeed strange
I had a quick look at whcc.com and their requirement re printing, sizes etc, and it would appear well nigh impossible if you send a psd file, with image sizes and resolution, that it could print incorrectly......yet you have the evidence.
Wes and DL-44 were on the only track I can think of, but after checking out whcc.com site and the way they receive files.......??????........ stranger and stranger.....have you sent them test prints as they request - did they come back correctly sized? Cheers.

[sense] Organisation is anathema to organisations [/sense]

Wes
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Inside THE BOX
Insane since: May 2000

posted posted 04-11-2006 18:59

Have you called WHCC? They're usually pretty good with customer support.



Post Reply
 
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
 
Your Text:
Loading...
Options:


« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu