Judas wasn't ? — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

Philosophy and other Silliness

This page's ID: 27743

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	[quote]About the Q document, a little connection. There is also a book called the Annals of the Kings that is refered to several times in the old testament. I don't really see what's so special about a "Q" document that two Gospel writers pulled information from. I mean, it would be nice to have, but is it that unique?[/quote] From one Christian to Another: Gideon.. There are many thousands of christian writings that surfaced when the official canon was selected. You may not even know about or of them. The early chruches have these documents in their libraires. They are still available for reading. Many of them were not selected because the council decided what books were best used to spread the faith. If we believe as Christians that God has guided his church thru the 2000 centuries we must believe though new finds may be revelent historically and may have some impact it does not alter the creed of faith and never will. These Judas, Mageleline Gospels and the Di Vinci Code hype will pass over time and is something to fodder about. I have seen a resurgence of many Christians reading more about Church history because of the book and movie Di Vinci Code coming out. Thus they are becoming more knoweldgable in faith. [small](Edited by [url=http://www.ozoneasylum.com/user/3156]jade[/url] on 04-14-2006 19:32)[/small] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

« Backwards — Onwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu