Judas wasn't ? — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 27743

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	[quote] [b]WebShaman said:[/b] Which then lends even more credit to the "mysterious Q" source. [/quote] I'm with you on the first statement, but I don't see how this relates at all to 'q'other than the fact that it is an extrabibular xian text. We have a great deal of those though... There isn't much about 'q' that needs more credit either...it's a textual certainty that there was another source. 'q' is just the name given whatever work this source may be, as q is the first letter of the german word for source. I suppose I just don't like for anyone to think of 'q' as mysterious. We don't know what particular work this source was, but it is clear there was a textual source that luke and matthew (?) shared for part of their content, just as there were various sources for various parts of most ancient texts. =) [url=http://in-dented.com/sigs.html][img]http://in-dented.com/sigs/knot_sig_32.gif[/img][/url] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post