OZONE Asylum
Forums
Philosophy and other Silliness
God gene
This page's ID:
28011
Search
QuickChanges
Forums
FAQ
Archives
Register
Edit Post
Who can edit a post?
The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
Remember Me On This Computer
Your Text:
Insert Slimies »
Insert UBB Code »
Close
Last Tag
|
All Tags
UBB Help
A couple of things: Does the mentionned churches and religions accept the notion of genes altogether? Do creationists accept that concept at all? Otherwise, I see a lot of reasons why they would cringe. In the event they do accept genes, since they do not believe in evolution, then there still is matter for them to react (how comes some people are "evolved" or "elected" as Suho pointed out). Other than that, and that's maybe the main thing I see: creationists *would* question anything that questions a frail belief, methinks. Any new scientific fact carries a potential risk for something these people WANT to believe in. As a christian who spontaneously evolved towards other beliefs, I think creationnists and "extremely firm believers" want to believe and that it serves a purpose in theyre vision of life. It gives it a meaning, and gives a meaning to all the hurt and pain and feelings and sorrow one goes through during a lifetime. I read some about emotional responses and the hormonal system some time ago, and I strongly think this "need to believe" exists in strong believers as a NEED, they wouldn't cope without it. Therefore, I do "buy" the possibility of a gene that would impact this kind of addiction. My 2 cents.
Loading...
Options:
Enable Slimies
Enable Linkwords
« Backwards
—
Onwards »