OZONE Asylum
Forums
Philosophy and other Silliness
Zeitgeist - The Movie
This page's ID:
29547
Search
QuickChanges
Forums
FAQ
Archives
Register
Edit Post
Who can edit a post?
The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
Remember Me On This Computer
Your Text:
Insert Slimies »
Insert UBB Code »
Close
Last Tag
|
All Tags
UBB Help
Columbia University Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades is what you are looking for in terms of seismographic data. I know there is more from them, including a 10 page or so analysis of WTC 1 & 2, but this is all I am able to dig up at the moment: http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/WTC_20010911.html To my knowledge, they are the only ones who recorded the events. You might also check out chapter 5 of the FEMA report, which is devoted entirely to WTC7, although they downplay their hypothesis (diesel fuel tanks --> fire+minor damage from debris --> loss of structural integrity and subsequent collapse) as improbable. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf [quote]The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue. -section 5.7, Observations and Findings, para 2.[/quote] Other than that, NIST has yet to release their final study of the collapse of WTC7. It was due earlier this year, but is lagging a bit it seems. Eagerly awaiting what they have to say. Last, oddly enough, the 9/11 Commission Report doesn't mention WTC7. From the other side of things I would recommend both 911 Mysteries and Improbable Collapse. 911 Mysteries focuses on the collapses and is a proponent of the controlled demo theory. They try to come at it from a more scientific angle than your typical "conspiracy theory" film, although there is a bit of easily identified speculation intertwined. Improbable Collapse covers the the "thermite/thermate hypothesis" as proposed by BYU physics professor Steven Jones. Both contain a lot of invaluable footage and are thought provoking regardless. Full HQ DivX avi of 911 Mysteries can be found here: http://nw0.info/?p=Documentaries/ You could probably grab Improbable Collapse from any number of sources (BitTorrent, Usenet), but if all else fails, it's on youtube. The Journal of 9/11 studies is another interesting resource. http://www.journalof911studies.com/ As it stands, I don't think we have enough scientific data to say for sure one way or the other what caused the collapse of 7. Not sure that that will ever change. I must admit that right now I don't know what to make of WTC7; I know what my leanings are, considering a lot of other information and "coincidences", but that is all purely speculation which I don't think is worth discussing because it leads nowhere. Hope that helps, Ram
Loading...
Options:
Enable Slimies
Enable Linkwords
« Backwards
—
Onwards »