XHTML 2 vs. HTML 5 — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 30018

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	[b]Resio[/b]: It's wasn't rejected by W3C so much as never up for discussion because the W3C was hellbent on a pure XML successor for XHTML. When TBL saw that XTML2 was a no-fly with browser vendors and that the WHAT WG was likely to take over the HTML technology unless HTML was again folded into the W3C portfolio, he decided to reopen the HTML activity - more to keep control over the language within the W3C than because it was a path he wanted to follow from the sounds of it. The adoption of WHAT WG spec Web Applications 1.0 as the base for a W3C HTML 5 spec was something that came after that from a WG decision. -- var Liorean = { abode: "[sigrotate][url]http://liorean.web-graphics.com/[/url]\|[url]http://codingforums.com/[/url]\|[url]http://web-graphics.com/[/url][/sigrotate]", profile: "[url]http://codingforums.com/member.php?u=5798[/url]"}; Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post