XHTML 2 vs. HTML 5 — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 30018

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	Well, XHTML 2 is kinda dead, and it's not backward compatible so ... It won't get broadly implemented until 2029. HTML5 is backward compatible and modular to ease the implementation. Also the spec goes into great details on how to parse the markup, fail and the conditions of failure for every thing, ... it's much better than anything else I have seen from the W3C. Also, in a nutshell HTML5 is targetted at the real world while XHTML 2 comes from Utopia, and might stay there for a little while. [b]reisio:[/b] HTML5 is authored by both the WTF and the W3C. But the important thing is that it is endorsed by the W3C. [url=http://www.p01.org/][sigrotate][img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_love.gif[/img]\|[img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_love_small.gif[/img]\|[img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_charly.gif[/img]\|[img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_dk.gif[/img]\|[img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_reason.gif[/img]\|[img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_galaxy.gif[/img]\|[img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_neon88x31.gif[/img]\|[img]http://poi.ribbon.free.fr/files/p01_ozoneasylum_sig_teapot.png[/img][/sigrotate][/url] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post