XHTML 2 vs. HTML 5 — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 30018

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	[quote] XHTML 2 comes from Utopia, and might stay there for a little while. [/quote] Something like : xhtml is supposedly a subset of xml, so sort of an hybrid between SGML (encompassing HTML) and XML (encompassing many useful subsets like rss for news). Problem of this : if you and I were to write TRUELY valid xhtml - strictly compliant to both his "originating standards", it would be a HUGE pain in the ass. The "Utopia" mentioned by poi is "Semantic web" : a web where machines can read pages as well as humans do, more or less. I am a believer, but this utopia has been around for years and has not reached significant milestones yet : my new designs of www.beyondwonderland.com and www.mauro-colella.com aim to take this in account at a "core" level - the structure would allow each individual resource to be described using rss. But in real world, the future, and a web prone to quirks in it's very nature, is about HTML 5, HTML 5, and then.. HTML 5. And ROFLMAO at poi's new web standard institution : the WTF!!! (laughing so hard I am crying). [small](Edited by [url=http://www.ozoneasylum.com/user/6553]argo navis[/url] on 02-23-2008 01:48)[/small] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post