Texas Rejects Creationist Science Degree Accreditation — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 30250

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	I can't help but chime in again, even with the shameful knowledge that I'm contributing little other than a boisterous cheer, but I have to support the presented argument of a difference between theological and scientific education. As far as I am concerned, theology deserves little more importance in education than a side note (motivations; genocide, for example) to pretty much all of morbid interest in historical education. I have long held the firm opinion that not only is religion an issue of intensely [i]personal[/i] and [i]private[/i] belief, but that indoctrinated and instituted (i.e- organised) religion has no place in a truly enlightened society. I am pretty much convinced that while this view may stick in a few throats, it is hardly radical. Might I add that the 'two back' I expected were amply supplied by South Carolina's effort, as referred to by DL-44. Much as it dismays me, I take some solace from the knowledge that the disappointments I anticipate are often fulfilled. There is some comfort in the predictability of things, even if relying upon the cynical presumption that humans are, on the whole, little better than sheep. The sad thing is that it's all going to get [i]so[/i] much worse before it gets better. History repeats. Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post