Better quality with image stacking — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 30507

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	I learned some years ago that amateur astronomers use some pretty interesting techniques (image stacking) for enhancing the image quality of cheap cameras and even [url=http://www.usno.navy.mil/pao/QuickCamAstro.shtml]webcams[/url] to take amazing pictures of the stars and planets. Does anyone have any experience with this? I've managed to dig up 2 names: [url=http://www.heliconsoft.com/heliconfocus.html]Helicon[/url] and [url=http://www.broadhurst-family.co.uk/lefteye/MainPages/combinez.htm]CombineZ[/url]. Haven't yet had time to test either one. What I would ultimately like to do is this: take x number of pictures of a static object and combine them into 1 really hi-def image. It would be really cool if the application could also be used for pictures that have semi-static object such as trees/grass swaying in wind etc. edit: Another name that bubbled up: [url=http://www.astronomie.be/registax/index.html]Registax[/url] [small](Edited by [url=http://www.ozoneasylum.com/user/3736]Arthurio[/url] on 08-27-2008 15:12)[/small] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post