Canon 5D Mark II — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 30569

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	I'm a Canon user but generally I wouldn't consider myself Canon's fan. I have much more faith in Nikon ... but I already have some Canon glass and not enough money to switch so I have to stick with Canon. Nikon's noise is much more grainy and looks kinda old school while Canon's noise looks like bad jpg compression plus it seems like Nikon innovates more and releases cool new features earlier than Canon. Of course the new guys such as Sony innovate even more. Canon and Nikon are both trying to make a lot of money from the peripherals that should be really cheap to manufacture. Essential features that are keeping Canon 5D mk II from being a truly great camera in my opinion: Movable(what's the right word here?) live view screen for better filming. Full control over shutter speed, iso, aperture, fps, resolution etc while filming. - A software problem really. Canon please don't fudge with the software. In camera stabilizer. Even if it helps just 1 stop it's worth it. Nice looking noise. Another processor. The 1D has 2 digic3-s ... the new 5D should have 2 digic4-s because the 3.9 fps really doesn't cut it these days. Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post