Pi - Clarification — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 31022

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	"an infinite number of points cannot exist" Following directly on the heels of a rather poignant explanation that a "point" is a construct holding mental placement but without physical dimensionality aside from position, that statement rings blatantly false. Since a point occupies no physical space, it then cannot be defined to have a follow-circumference (just to continue the sphero-centric theme), therefore another point can exist infinitely close to the first, just not in the exact same space (which...like PI can be defined to any incremental unit...microns...atomic...proton widths). Sorry guys, the Tao is dead on with this one...infinitum is discernable simply through the logic of understanding that any measurable distance can be dealt with in decreasing units merely by the power of the observer and/or his observational tools. Now we're not going to get into Heisenberg ;) Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post