Pi - Clarification — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 31022

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	Again though - is a 'wave' actually and literally the reciprocating deviation of a particle from its path, or just the most convenient method of describing and predicting the behaviour of radiation? I would once have thought this a silly question, but the answer is not apparently simple. Is it more accurate to consider waves a property of the particle rather than representative of its path; more a [url=http://milesmathis.com/schrod.html]pulsing[/url] than a wobbling? So, if I send my electron whizzing around a cyclotron in an attempt to take a four-dimensional photo of a perfect circle, would I end up with a giant cog (a wiggly-lined circle) or a [url=http://www.ozoneasylum.com/30785]lightning ring[/url], or simply a near-perfect circle..?* *[small]...even if the photo is granular and fuzzy, and poorly/imperfectly represents the path I've imaged with my magical camera.[/small] [small](Edited by [url=http://www.ozoneasylum.com/user/4663]White Hawk[/url] on 06-02-2009 17:42)[/small] Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post