not what u r thinking.....but ever noticed how we as human beings seem to follow certain fixed routines in whatever it is we undertake, for instance
- waking up
- eating
- sleeping
- routes we take to whatever destinations
- recreational activities
- going to the loo (offloading)
hmmm....how diffrent r we from the ant colonies.......for instance zoom out of the current city u r in.....now watch urself as u r performing the various activities of ur day to day...going here, walking there.....but within the same small area following a specific pattern....
An ant doesnt know life outside its colony......
Happy anting.. and try to do somethng totally diffrent today...
My personal favorite example is to wash yourself in a different order the next time you bathe. I've suggested this to several folks and they almost always come back with the same thing: "I washed my hair twice."
Back when I was on the road a lot, lack of conscious effort got the best of me several times. Quite often I would be on the highway heading to a town in particular and end up on the way home. Then I would have to back-track. Familiar roads, familiar routes... my mind would wander - lack of conscious effort.
Take anything this is routine and mix it up. See what happens. Can you still do it? Will that small part of your brain get confused?
From: The Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001
posted 06-02-2009 10:21
Taking a different route in the morning to work would end up making me more stressed - because the way I take is off the beaten path, to avoid the traffic jams.
I absolutely f**king hate traffic jams!
They are narrowly above people-who-think-it-is-fun-to-drive-20-miles-under-the-speed-limit - it is my belief that
twin 30mm Vulcan Chain Gun Cannons were invented soley for this reason.
What?
Oh, we were talking about breaking the pattern, getting out of the rut, confusing the grey matter between the ears (and I don't mean wax here).
Ermmm...yeah.
You all must have too much time on your hands to worry about these types of things.
WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.
- Sophocles
Tyberius Prime
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers
From: Germany Insane since: Sep 2001
posted 06-02-2009 12:57
actually, there is some truth to this.
Modern man actually is much less free than most wild animals on this planet, if you consider freedom as 'goes where it wants, when it wants'.
This has been show by al large scale analysis of cell phone data - most people really do the work / pub /home /work shuffle... now if I could only remember the authors...
I took your advice, and last night, while I was playing Battlefield 2142, I did something random and out of the norm. Unfortunately, as it turns out, you can't stab someone with an assault rifle, or shoot them with a knife, and my score was abysmal.
Certain rules that we trap ourselves with are entirely necessary, intuitive, and sensible. We don't walk in the middle of the motorway, walk off the edge of tall buildings, or keep our heads in the oven while roasting just in case the turkey gets lonely. These are rules we pick up quickly, learn through experience, or know intuitively, and disregard at our dire peril.
As for the daily routine - yes, it is a prison, but one I know sustains many. I've lost count of the number of times I've heard of people who retired, had nothing to do, and died within months or a short few years. Once the routine is gone, it can be bloody hard to find something else to fill your days with.
Somewhere halfway between the two is probably good for the health. Keep a routine, and make time for something different every now and again... or does that make variation part of the routine..?
Yes, we are institutionalised; rendered as executors of our function, and that function defines our daily routine. When there is no routine left, and the uncontrollable vagaries of the daily grind have given way to empty hours, days, and weeks in the restless afterlife (for some, half-life) of retirement, you have only one purpose left-
Find something to fill 600-700 hours a month with, or die for want of it.
Actually, I have a daily routine that gives me something a little different every day, and often helps me to snap out of a dark mood; I talk to strangers. I receive defensive, terrified or sometimes hostile reactions, but more often than not, I get to meet and chat with someone interesting for a few minutes of an otherwise dull and annoying commute.
More importantly, I make it a goal of every day to make at least one person smile. Believing in the intrinsic logic of Karma, this satisfies more than just my need to flirt.
_____
Haha, WS!
quote:They are narrowly above people-who-think-it-is-fun-to-drive-20-miles-under-the-speed-limit - it is my belief that twin 30mm Vulcan Chain Gun Cannons were invented soley for this reason.
I get stuck as a passenger around the city (in the work van, on public transport, etc) more often than I care for. My head gradually fills with the sounds of explosive projectiles, chain-gun fire, and an exotic array of anti-vehicle weaponry/machinery. It kills a surprising amount of time... if nothing else.
I took your advice, and last night, while I was playing Battlefield 2142, I did something random and out of the norm. Unfortunately, as it turns out, you can't stab someone with an assault rifle, or shoot them with a knife, and my score was abysmal.
...This actually describes the real life situation....since most of us are already programmed to perform specific actions.....life would be "abysmal" if they tried to do anythng out of the norm...
quote: White Hawk said:
Actually, I have a daily routine that gives me something a little different every day, and often helps me to snap out of a dark mood; I talk to strangers. I receive defensive, terrified or sometimes hostile reactions, but more often than not, I get to meet and chat with someone interesting for a few minutes of an otherwise dull and annoying commute.
"strangers"....I am sure if I was to analyse the people u pick out as strangers am sure I will find a pattern in there somewhere.....for instance curved hips...
quote: WebShaman said:
I play Foos, every day that I can.And that is always different.Does that count?WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.- Sophocles
..let ur PC crush and will c wat options u r left with...
quote: warjournal said:
This reminds of a conscious effort exercise.My personal favorite example is to wash yourself in a different order the next time you bathe. I've suggested this to several folks and they almost always come back with the same thing: "I washed my hair twice."
..definately trying this out...will start with the feet...
Different from ants? We're self-aware, capable of intelligent thought, capable of learning, our minds function using more than just blind instinct, we're not creepy, we don't cause phobias (mostly), we know what the phrases "personal space" and "this is my room GTFO" mean, and we're very large.
(Is it bad that I tend to respond to complex or thought-provoking threads with the simplest replies possible?)
quote: DavidJCobb said:
Different from ants? We're self-aware, capable of intelligent thought, capable of learning, our minds function using more than just blind instinct, we're not creepy, we don't cause phobias (mostly), we know what the phrases "personal space" and "this is my room GTFO" mean, and we're very large
.... I like to bring to you attention that awareness is relative to conscience level of the species......n looking at some of the things we are capable of am no longer sure where we fall.....
I have to disagree with DavidJCobb on some points:
"Self aware" is subjective - most animals are capable of recognising themselves in a reflection, for instance.
I would argue that a substantial number of individuals (in my city, for instance), whether capable, show little evidence of intelligent thought.
Ants behave like individual neurons in a large brain - they might seem to function on blind instinct, but as a colony, show problem solving abilities that would astound you.
People who fear 'creepy' insects show a distinct lack of conscious control over 'blind instinct', and I think phobias relating to strangers, other people, or open spaces, are fairly numerous. Also, I find lots of people creepy; Gordon Brown is a good example. *shudder*
Personal space is no more respected by busy commuters than within the interior of an industrious ant colony. It wouldn't be practical.
Burglars don't give a damn whose room it is, and in this country, you're risking a prison sentence if you're a little zealous in compelling them to leave.
In fact, as a substantial number of humans can't even queue properly, show no talent for teamwork, refuse to relinquish illogical or irrational beliefs, superstions, or phobias, or behave in a patently unintelligent and inconsiderate manner, I think ants have us beat on standards for a functional society - evidence a-plenty in their continued success.
...and how many humans do you know that can lift several times their own body weight?
We can only aspire to the qualities exemplified by the amazing ant!
From: The Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001
posted 06-03-2009 11:06
quote:quote:
WebShaman said:
I play Foos, every day that I can.And that is always different.Does that count?WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.- Sophocles
..let ur PC crush and will c wat options u r left with...
When you said 'Foos', I thought you meant Foosball but wasn't sure. Ah, nothing like a slam to slash the back of your hand. My injuries have been minor, but I've seen some nasty cuts on drunken frat boys.
From: The Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001
posted 06-03-2009 16:47
Foos is Foosball - table soccer.
What does that have to do with a "PC Crush"
quote:Ah, nothing like a slam to slash the back of your hand. My injuries have been minor, but I've seen some nasty cuts on drunken frat boys.
Though I have had some minor muscle pulls in the hand and wrist area from Foos, I have never heard of someone slashing the back of a hand playing Foos before.
WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.
- Sophocles
Wow, Web. Back of the hand used to happen all the time in my neighborhood. Mostly newbs and drunks, but somewhat common. Opponent would slam the shaft and the opposite end would become dangerous. Gave a whole new meaning to defense when the slap-shot was coming. Of course it didn't help that the ends of the shafts weren't padded or rounded-off. Most of the rinky-dink Foos games I've seen were like this back in the day.
Full-contact Foosball, anyone?
I wonder if I can make a full-contact version of Tangram...?
From: The Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001
posted 06-03-2009 21:26
quote:Wow, Web. Back of the hand used to happen all the time in my neighborhood. Mostly newbs and drunks, but somewhat common. Opponent would slam the shaft and the opposite end would become dangerous. Gave a whole new meaning to defense when the slap-shot was coming. Of course it didn't help that the ends of the shafts weren't padded or rounded-off. Most of the rinky-dink Foos games I've seen were like this back in the day.
Full-contact Foosball, anyone?
I wonder if I can make a full-contact version of Tangram...?
Wow, never heard of that before, WJ. Though the ends of rods can be somewhat dangerous (especially to children), I have yet to see anyone injured by them. Are you talking about the really old tables, per chance?
I'm trying to picture how someone could be injured by another player on the other side, and drawing a blank - if one is holding a rod in hand the entire time (which the rules say one is supposed to), I am kind of having trouble seeing how the end of an opposing rod can hit any part of the body, really.
WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.
- Sophocles
Self-aware as in "capable of passing the mirror test"; "we don't cause phobias (mostly)"; I'll admit that some people are creepy, but surely not our entire species as a whole -- though I'll admit that my insectophobia might be giving me somewhat of a bias when judging the creepiness of certain species...
As for the comparative analysis (that's the right term, right?), I suppose that in a species that is not entirely ruled by instinct, psychological flaws are inevitable... I think it's partly how we're raised -- often, people grow up with such illogical and irrational beliefs, never given the freedom to decide for themselves what they believe, and eventually not even desiring such freedom and even condemning it.
No idea how old the tables were, Web. Pretty much happened while switching rods while the hands were too low. Other than that, I guess we can chaulk it up to cultural difference or something. You know, us folks in MI are notorious for violence. With the way our militia is and the occassion rogue, I'm suprised the Boy Scouts here are receiving military training like in Cali (I think Cali?).
David brings up a point:
quote:often, people grow up with such illogical and irrational beliefs, never given the freedom to decide for themselves what they believe, and eventually not even desiring such freedom and even condemning it
I've had this discussion more than a few times.
Hooker Neice lives with Grandma. According to Grandma, Hooker Neice is free to believe in whatever she wants to when it comes to religion. And yet Grandma takes Hooker Neice to church and Hooker Neice is always going on about going to Hell. Claims of religious freedom, and yet putting massive spin and bias on it.
Also happened here in the Asylum. A parent here was talking about knowingly and blatantly lying to children in order to get them to believe in Jesus.
I'm not sure ants have the visual acuity to even 'see' a mirror, but I know dogs easily pass the mirror test (far more often than cats, it seems), and elephants easily pass it. I think the mirror test is a little restrictive, though, as even my fish show distinctly intelligent/curious behaviour from time to time, and have a range of observable personality traits that suggest a level of awareness - one of them has figured out that jumping and striking a specific point on the lid draws attention, and if she's lucky, food. How intelligent do they have to be in order to recognise themselves as disparate individuals? I should think any one of my fish (even the really stupid ones) knows its own reflection, even if they can't blog about it.
I don't think ants go out of their way to cause phobias (or creep people out) any more than people do. Phobias are irrational fears, and can be a fear of even the most harmless things. People are prone to fear a spider that's small, harmless and hairy more than a big, cuddly-looking dog that could quite easily rip their throat out and make a meal of their thigh muscles. Ants aren't creepy in any sense other than that they perceivably 'creep' on six legs (actually, I'd call it a complex sort of sprint, considering the ground they can cover) - the quality of 'being creepy' is an appellation applied by the observer, and wholly a matter of opinion.
As spiders go though (subject of far more widespread phobia than any insect, I'd warrant) I would rather share my bedroom with a couple of harmless British house spiders than see what fills the shadowy little corners when they're not around - in this respect, I think them far more useful than creepy. In this country it is wise to avoid killing spiders, as people who get bitten by outdoor/foreign spiders in the home, or are bothered by insect pests, have usually killed the very spiders that would have kept their numbers down. A species of garden spider from the UK finds indoor environments in the US particularly cosy, especially as common predatory house spiders (that are harmless to humans) haven't crossed the pond with them. They are responsible for quite a few hospitalisation cases every year over there, even though gardeners on this side of the pond rarely encounter them.
Even if Gordon Brown were as useful as a house spider, I would find him no less creepy (every time that insincere, double-speaking, thieving, corrupt and insidious little creep tries to crack a smile, it makes me ill). He only has two legs, and waddles convincingly, but I think him creepier than Creepity McCreep of Creepville, Country Creep, receiving a medal at the Creepville Competitive Creeping event after using a Dr. Brundle teleportation device to ensure he made it to the event on time...
As for the question of indoctrination - I don't think one would be lying if one were to express one's beliefs... but I don't know of any religious organisation that hasn't (or still doesn't) arbitrarily blanket or embellish the truth in order to further its own cause or protect it from scandal. That there are those foolish enough to blindly follow and repeat ensures that lies are perpetuated as truth by those who are unaware of the lie. "The Catholic church isn't infected with institutionalised paedophilia" for instance.
As for the beliefs themselves, who can say how much is lie, truth, misunderstood, misrepresented, or just plain old fantasy? I find it remarkable that thousands of years ago, several different cultures had stories of flying, flaming metal war chariots, weapons of such incredible destruction that the earth was scorched for miles, skies would blacken, and the land would remain lifeless and toxic for many years, or tales of invisible stars that orbited eachother... all before modern science and technology, nukes, telescopes, etc. I wonder of a time when men marvelled at things they had not adequate language or understanding to convey, and what secrets are held in our ancient past...
...but then, it could all just be incredible hogwash. It was written by humans after all...
quote: White Hawk said:
I'm not sure ants have the visual acuity to even 'see' a mirror,
...I have seen them avoid rain drops....n we know this have mirror effect
quote: White Hawk said:
Even if Gordon Brown were as useful as a house spider, I would find him no less creepy (every time that insincere, double-speaking, thieving, corrupt and insidious little creep tries to crack a smile, it makes me ill). He only has two legs, and waddles convincingly, but I think him creepier than Creepity McCreep of Creepville, Country Creep, receiving a medal at the Creepville Competitive Creeping event after using a Dr. Brundle teleportation device to ensure he made it to the event on time
.....would I be wrong to assume you dont like him...
quote:I should think any one of my fish (even the really stupid ones) knows its own reflection, even if they can't blog about it.
Siamese fighting fish try to kill their reflections. Fish don't seem to have self-esteem, so I'm pretty sure they simply fail to recognize their own reflection.
quote:I know dogs easily pass the mirror test (far more often than cats, it seems)
From what I've heard, most dogs fail it. They may act nice to their reflections, but they usually fail to notice that their reflections are reflections.
quote:I don't think ants go out of their way to cause phobias (or creep people out) any more than people do. Phobias are irrational fears, and can be a fear of even the most harmless things. People are prone to fear a spider that's small, harmless and hairy more than a big, cuddly-looking dog that could quite easily rip their throat out and make a meal of their thigh muscles. Ants aren't creepy in any sense other than that they perceivably 'creep' on six legs (actually, I'd call it a complex sort of sprint, considering the ground they can cover) - the quality of 'being creepy' is an appellation applied by the observer, and wholly a matter of opinion.
As I stated, I have a bias. Interestingly, though, I seem to have overgeneralized the blame -- ants are one of the subjects of my phobia, but I'm fairly certain that it was a tick that caused the phobia in the first place.
quote:As for the beliefs themselves, who can say how much is lie, truth, misunderstood, misrepresented, or just plain old fantasy? I find it remarkable that thousands of years ago, several different cultures had stories of flying, flaming metal war chariots, weapons of such incredible destruction that the earth was scorched for miles, skies would blacken, and the land would remain lifeless and toxic for many years, or tales of invisible stars that orbited eachother... all before modern science and technology, nukes, telescopes, etc. I wonder of a time when men marvelled at things they had not adequate language or understanding to convey, and what secrets are held in our ancient past...
...but then, it could all just be incredible hogwash. It was written by humans after all...
Some of it could be rooted in observable phenomena -- eclipses, volcanic ash blocking out the sun, plagues, famines. Also, humans have had a historical obsession with fire, so maybe the ancients agree that Fire + Destructive Things = Awesome, if it's on your side.
I think you are doing dogs a great injustice. They usually show little interest in their own reflections after their initial curiosity or excitement, simply because they have enough intelligence to recognise it as themselves, rather than another dog, threat, or potential shag. Stand behind them so that they can see you in the reflection, and they will show every sign of knowing there aren't suddenly two of you in the room.
The dumbest dog I ever had (an English Bull Terrier - so much character, so little brain) used to watch his arse in the mirror as an aid to chasing his tail. Yes, he was that daft.
An old German Shepherd of ours (RIP, Regal Lord Robert), once his legs were no longer good enough for bouncing up and down the stairs, used to save himself the bother by menacing visitors via the hallway mirrors on their way up the stairs. If you were to approach him from behind, in full view of the mirror, he would look behind him.
Dogs have a distinct intellectual advantage over most other animals in that selective breeding over many generations by humans has given them an almost unparalleled social intellect. A pup of just a few weeks can be shown to possess a greater intellectual ability to understanding 'persistence' (whereby something out of sight is in fact, still in existence) and 'theory of mind' (put yourself in another's shoes) than even a human child of four-five years old!
To be perfectly honest, I feel that most of these tests are out-dated and based upon misconceptions about the nature of animals/intelligence. At one time or another, humans assumed they were alone in such things as experiencing sexual pleasure, using tools, solving problems / learning by example, or being aware of 'self'. By degrees, the certainty of these principles has been eroded so that now we have to accept simple and provable truths such as; elephants are self aware; crows make and use tools; dolphins shag for fun; apes sit and chatter with eachother in large groups; dogs can be taught to retrieve something referred to by its name alone - "fetch the ball", "fetch the squeaky toy", "put the rubber bone in the basket".
Humans vastly underestimate the utility, social, and emotional intelligence of animals even today - a throwback to the religious assertion that we are god's special pets. We're just a few degrees more intelligent than your average balding ape is all.
I vaguely recall an experiment done wtih apes concerning 'awereness of other'. Something about playing a practical joke on someone else and having sympathy. They enjoyed playing jokes on each other and would laugh it up. But when they felt the humility of a being the butt of a prank, they lost their taste for pranking others because they could identity with said humility. They knew what it was like and they didn't want to impose that feeling on other apes.
From: The Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001
posted 06-05-2009 17:16
quote:But when they felt the humility of a being the butt of a prank, they lost their taste for pranking others because they could identity with said humility. They knew what it was like and they didn't want to impose that feeling on other apes.
Hmmm...we must have lost that ability, somewhere along the evolutionary trail...
WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.
- Sophocles
quote: White Hawk said:
My colleagues think I'm having a breakdown...
......This makes me wonder.....could conditions like psychosis, schizophrenia and the rest.....be some advanced states of the mind that the current human beings are yet to comprehend...and label them as such since...the individuals seem to be acting out of the norm....
From: The Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001
posted 06-08-2009 17:17
quote: binary said:
quote:White Hawk said:My colleagues think I'm having a breakdown.........This makes me wonder.....could conditions like psychosis, schizophrenia and the rest.....be some advanced states of the mind that the current human beings are yet to comprehend...and label them as such since...the individuals seem to be acting out of the norm....~Sig coming soon~
My People believe that - that those with such conditions have been "touched" by the Gods and therefore are the way they are.
I personally do not know how much of that is factual - perhaps such individuals are truly in some advanced state of mind.
I think that it probably has more to do with chemical imbalances and the physical condition and connections of the Brain, myself.
WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.
- Sophocles
This makes me wonder.....could conditions like psychosis, schizophrenia and the rest.....be some advanced states of the mind that the current human beings are yet to comprehend...and label them as such since...the individuals seem to be acting out of the norm....~Sig coming soon~
They certainly have altered states... I wouldn't necessarily call them advanced. Paranoid schizophrenia, turning every sensory stimulus into a small chunk of an intricate and incredibly paranoid delusion... I wouldn't call that advanced, wouldn't call that progress.
quote:
[Paranoid schizophrenia, turning every sensory stimulus into a small chunk of an intricate and incredibly paranoid delusion... I wouldn't call that advanced, wouldn't call that progress.----------------------
...consider this what if the current normal man is only suffering from one delusional state....n the our friends the Paranoid schizophrenia's...have a condition whereby they are able to experince diffrent illusions....an abstract example would be consider TV stations...normal man can only tune into one station...schizo's are able to tune into diffrent stations.....then who do u think is having more fun....
I have trouble shutting down my brain a lot of the time. I can't 'tune out' the noises around me, and they contend with the noises in my head. People think I'm easily distracted - they don't know the half of it... so I can only imagine what it must be like to have every line open, every signal at full volume, every thought and back-office function of the brain manifested 'on-screen'. It's not like tuning into several stations - it's like having them all tuned at the same time in the same viewing space, and trying to make sense of just one.
quote: White Hawk said:
Nothing fun about schizophrenia,
....in this case I was thinking of the perfect evolved man who is abe to reduce/increase/switch the stations @ will....
quote: White Hawk said:
I can't 'tune out' the noises around me, and they contend with the noises in my head. People think I'm easily distracted - they don't know the half of it...
.....I empathize with ur condition...but on a lighter note u could be one of those humans in the leading edge of the evolutional process....
quote:....in this case I was thinking of the perfect evolved man who is abe to reduce/increase/switch the stations @ will....
Evolution? Pfft! That's LSD, mate.
I sincerely doubt I'm on the leading edge of anything but procrastination (in which I am truly an accomplished artiste), and I'm not sure I have a condition, though I do think it's related to my migraines. I cope with it by using an age-old herbal remedy, meditation, and violent video games.
I know what you mean though. Look at the amazing abilities of some autism sufferers. There seems to be a compromise between higher functions and processing capacity - what if you could switch your brain over to different modes; "Rainman mode" and "social mode" for instance?
From: The Happy Hunting Grounds... Insane since: Mar 2001
posted 06-10-2009 16:27
quote: binary said:
quote:WebShaman said:I want photographic memory"....this easily achievable with some little training and focus....~Sig coming soon~
I beg to differ here.
A photographic memory does not forget ANYTHING it has ever been exposed to, ever, visually, and can be called up at will.
In end effect, it is perfect memory (visually orientated) - it has perfect storage and access.
This is NOT something that one can "easily" achieve with "little training and focus" - in fact, it is not something that one can
achieve with any amount of training and focus, for the physical makeup of the brain has to be changed, in and of itself.
Now, one can train one's memory, and one can train it pretty well and achieve astounding results that may have the simblance of a photographic memory, but make no mistake - it is not remotely similar.
For example, being able to recall each and every leaf on a tree with only one short glance - and never forgetting it, being able to call it up at will. One must also take into account, that one can call up ANY tree, at any time, that one has seen at any period in time, and do the same thing.
If you know how to easily achieve such a thing with a little training and focus, then you will soon become a very rich man (and actually should be so already). Of course, the military would have grabbed you a long time ago, were you capable of teaching others this.
WebShaman | The keenest sorrow (and greatest truth) is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities.
- Sophocles
I have to second WebShaman on that score. Techniques used to improve memory and observation skills, and tricks used to memorise information, will never match the full function of a photographic memory. It takes time, effort, and discipline in training and application of memory techniques for someone to purposely enhance their capacity for recall, whereas those with photographic memories are usually quite incapable of not memorising every detail they observe (consciously or not). The very manner in which information is processed by the brain differs dramatically in those with true photographic memory.
I would love to have that capacity as a brain 'mode' too, but I think it would be awful to be stuck with that all the time. I have enough trouble trying to shoe-horn new memories into my grey matter as it is with the endless piles of useless information I seem to soak up like a sponge.
Like Homer Simpson, I fear that every new memory displaces an old one - one day, I'll read an amazing (but utterly useless) fact, and I'll immediately forget who I am!
I have to second WebShaman on that score. Techniques used to improve memory and observation skills, and tricks used to memorise information, will never match the full function of a photographic memory. It takes time, effort, and discipline in training and application of memory techniques for someone to purposely enhance their capacity for recall, whereas those with photographic memories are usually quite incapable of not memorising every detail they observe (consciously or not). The very manner in which information is processed by the brain differs dramatically in those with true photographic memory.I would love to have that capacity as a brain 'mode' too, but I think it would be awful to be stuck with that all the time. I have enough trouble trying to shoe-horn new memories into my grey matter as it is with the endless piles of useless information I seem to soak up like a sponge.Like Homer Simpson, I fear that every new memory displaces an old one - one day, I'll read an amazing (but utterly useless) fact, and I'll immediately forget who I am!
ROFLtrue.
I wonder if there is some kind of drug that, instead of causing hallucinations or brain damage, simply temporarily and drastically improves the rate, speed, and application of the speed at which information passes from sensory registers into short-term memory, and from there into long-term...
Though, being unfamiliar with the science of photographic memory (which I believe is formally called eidetic memory), I would guess that people with photo-mem have some kind of mechanism that just bypasses short-term memory and copies everything from sensory into long-term automatically...
Gentlemen....I thought by now we all agreed that the fact that "you" can't do it is not a premise of justying that something can not be done.....note that I used to key words training and focus....now considering that what is said about us only using 5-10% of our brains...then take into considerations a child being brought up in an environment where this training is emphasized...the brain will then have no option but to adapt....
imho..what is needed is just time and effort and u will be suprised with what u can achieve.....
quote:now considering that what is said about us only using 5-10% of our brains
Urban legend. Based on experiments done with rats. Or mice. One or the other.
If you want to see something cool, search for the phrase "multiple mentality" in quotes. That will really push your brain, but it certaintly won't give you eiditic capabilities.
The brain has an awful lot more functions than mere 'thinking', with various parts dedicated to a wide range of administration and regulation tasks - background services that operate in significantly more than 10% of the brain's mass. On top of that, we use as much of the higher functions of the brain as is required for a given application, and on a daily basis, that is significantly and necessarily less than 100%.
If your CPU was running at 100% all the time, not only would it be at risk of overheating (or producing a hell of a lot of fan noise ), it would also demonstrate either that you require a more powerful processor, or that you have a serious hardware/software issue.
Your brain has neurons numbered in the hundreds of billions whereas CPUs generally number transistors in the hundreds of millions. Even the most powerful GPUs (generally, due their specialist nature, denser than CPUs) have no more than a billion-or-so transistors.
Unlike transistors, neurons work analogically, producing varied strengths and patterns of pulse to relate information in different ways. This essentially means that a far greater amount of data can be encoded by a single neuron than by a single transistor (which more than makes up for the obviously greater latency of the electro-chemical process compared to the electronic).
Basically, your brain manages to process vast volumes of data without breaking a sweat or requiring exotic cooling methods. It is so complex (mechanically and functionally) that even after generations of intensive study and extraordinary advances in technology, the brain (human or otherwise) is still barely understood by scientists.
Anybody claiming to be a scientist who makes any kind of estimation of typical brain usage is either not a very good scientist, or has made a breakthrough worthy of a Nobel nomination. That's a fact!
_____
EDIT: By the way, iron does float! You can make iron float in one of two ways; shape it so that it displaces a greater mass of water than its own mass, or use a floatation medium with a greater specific gravity! Mercury is so dense even as a liquid than it bouys iron quite effectively.
quote:My colleagues think I'm having a breakdown...
I should point out, in case it wasn't entirely obvious, that I was referring to my uncharacteristic cheer on a Monday morning (of all mornings) - they were rather taken aback at the office.
I think we're all a little strange. We wouldn't be here otherwise.
yes we all are in a prison of ourself creation, we do not want to change the routines we have and even if the routine is changed by unconquerable events we are apprehensive of them.
consider this, all the individuals who ever achieved something or tried to to think out of the ordinary, we labeled them as delusional, schizophrenic psychotic and what not else, but actually they were the ones who proposed evolutionary concepts.
posted 06-02-2009 05:33
and try to do somethng totally diffrent today...
