Closed Thread Icon

Topic awaiting preservation: Netscape and 100%? Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=8057" title="Pages that link to Topic awaiting preservation: Netscape and 100%?" rel="nofollow" >Topic awaiting preservation: Netscape and 100%?\

 
Author Thread
bluecorr
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate

From:
Insane since: Jan 2002

posted posted 01-31-2002 20:26

I have a frameset. In one of the frames I've got a div layer which is 100%. The problem is it expands more than the frame it's in. if I shrink it to 80% it looks fine in Netscape but it's unacceptably short in IE.

So basically how do I make the layer have the SAME length in both browsers?

The div is not nested and the browsers in issue are NN 6.1 and IE 6.0

HELP!

Thanks

CPrompt
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: there...no..there.....
Insane since: May 2001

posted posted 01-31-2002 20:48

Hi bluecorr.

Well, a link to the page would be nice but... I am guessing that you are meaning the CSS width: 100%, right? In NN6.1 the CSS width is really funky. I had a similar problem that worked in NN6 but not 6.1.

Try taking out the width all together and see if that does the trick. Sounds kind of crude, but that is how I fixed my problem. Or you could set it to a definate width ie. 200px;

Post a link to the page or some of the code and that would help determine if the problem lies else where.

By the way, try to keep the CSS questions in the XML - XSL - XSLT - XHTML - CSS - DOM
forum. Just for future reference. Cool?

Later,
C:\


~Binary is best~

bluecorr
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate

From:
Insane since: Jan 2002

posted posted 01-31-2002 21:37

wow incredible!!! that worked. Can someone with NN 6.2 or 6 take a look and tell me if you see the scrollbar? Oh and take a look at the source code of that frame. The container is 95% wide but doesn't stretch that long (IE 6.0 that is).

I'll keep that in mind

PS: the url hehe www.mardiros.net (after the splash)


[This message has been edited by bluecorr (edited 01-31-2002).]

CPrompt
Maniac (V) Inmate

From: there...no..there.....
Insane since: May 2001

posted posted 01-31-2002 23:15

Glad that it worked for you. I fought with that for awhile before I figured it out.

Anyway the width thing in IE6. I think that it is a probelm with cross browser interpretation of the style sheet. I will have to take a closer look at it when I get home. CSS is sometimes kind of funny about the way it displays the width and stuff in different browsers.

I will take a closer look at it later, someone may be along later to help you though.

I like your pages by the way. The scroll bars work in NN6.1 but they are a little slow. One reason why I like to call it ShitScape.



Later,
C:\


~Binary is best~

bluecorr
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate

From:
Insane since: Jan 2002

posted posted 02-01-2002 06:34

can someone with NN 6.2 and NN 6.0 send me a snapshot? Is the frame the width it's supposed to have?


kuckus
Bipolar (III) Inmate

From: Berlin (almost)
Insane since: Dec 2001

posted posted 02-01-2002 08:26

Yes, in Netscape 6.2 it's looking and behaving just like in IE 6.

Screenshot? OK, check your mail!

have fun!
kuckus

bluecorr
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate

From:
Insane since: Jan 2002

posted posted 02-01-2002 11:54

thanks! can anyone with Linux check it on NN 6.2? I saw a funky screenshot and I was wondering if it's a general problem for Linux users.

Emperor
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers

From: Cell 53, East Wing
Insane since: Jul 2001

posted posted 02-01-2002 14:38

bluecorr: It looks like it is fixed but I wonder if it is something to do with the different interpretations of the box model. Have a look at:
http://glish.com/css/hacks.asp

and play around with the hack and see if that works. I had a similar problem with IFRAME widths but fiddling around sorted that out.

Emps

« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu