No Point to XHTML? — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists

This page's ID: 9587

Edit Post

Who can edit a post?	The poster and administrators may edit a post. The poster can only edit it for a short while after the initial post.

Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:	Remember Me On This Computer

Your Text: Insert Slimies » Insert UBB Code » Close Last Tag \| All Tags UBB Help	This [url=http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml]article[/url], endorsed by Mark "Brain the Size of Utah" Pilgrim, says that XHTML 1.0 is pointless. Pilgrim goes on to mention than XHTML 1.1 is just as bad, and XHTML 2.0 is shaping up to be worse. The solution? Mark Pilgrim, master of all things new and hip, has decided to go back to HTML 4.01. Every web designer on this board should think about this deeply. I know all my stuff is still XHTML 1.0 Strict, because I listened to Zeldman and decided it was the "correct" way of doing things... but now I'm not so sure. On the bright side, at least it still [i]works[/i]. Loading...
Options:	Enable Slimies Enable Linkwords

Edit Post