Preserved Topic: Handmade Gems in PS 5 (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-31-2000 07:44
In the course of my design travels over this past week, one of the problems I needed to solve was one which required that I create a sapphire completely by hand, with editable layers so that I could control transparency and such over a couple of different patters and layers. Now I could have used a third party 3d program, but It dawned on me how fun it might be to attempt a realistic looking gem using only photoshop. After a few hours of tinkering with a couple of different ideas, I've come up with this: |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: San Diego CA USA |
posted 08-31-2000 07:58
Hey I think it looks great, but it doesn't really have any facets. Is that the way you wanted it to look like it was cut? |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-31-2000 07:58
Ahh.. thats one of the things I've been struggling with. I want it to look faceted, but for some reason it keeps coming out very rounded, with only the front cut really showing. I'll work on that... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 08-31-2000 13:58
pretty cool tycho. overall it looks great, but a couple things don't seem right to me -- the real dark+thick curved lines top and bottom I think are too much contrast to the light light center; it mkaes it look almost like the center is sunken in. maybe if there were just a little more color in between the dark and the light...or a highlight that overlaps both the dark band and the light center should do the trick. |
Neurotic (0) Inmate Newly admitted |
posted 08-31-2000 15:15
if youre trying to make it look like a real gem, i think your halo looks way too luminous. gems sparkle, they dont glow. once my eyes adjusted to the intensity, it looks pretty good. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-31-2000 17:40
Oops, The glow was just an embellishment, not part of the actual composite. I should have made that clear. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 08-31-2000 17:47
Looks good but off hand Im not really sure what a gem would even look like. Im not at my house so I really cant ask my sisters and theres not exactly pictures lying around my boat. IT does look good and I agree with you and DL that those "blue strips" are a little too thing. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Houston(ish) Texas |
posted 08-31-2000 19:15
Well, it looks very pretty ... but if I were looking at it without knowing what you had intended, I wouldn't have guessed it to be a gem. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 08-31-2000 19:19
Here's another test: |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 08-31-2000 19:39
It does look very realistic... but I can't determine the shape of it... is it a crystal doughnut? It really looks like a torus, but I can't tell if I'm looking at it from the top or at an angle. |
Bipolar (III) Mad Scientist From: Camillus, NY, USA |
posted 09-01-2000 04:39
It looks like a Mancala bead, Tycho...except that center is really too light...it looks like it's sunken in...I was screwing around trying for something to the effect of a gem and I came up with this: |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: |
posted 09-01-2000 05:04 |
Bipolar (III) Mad Scientist From: Camillus, NY, USA |
posted 09-01-2000 05:17
Not funny. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 09-01-2000 05:50
Yes it was ... <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/smile.gif"> |
Bipolar (III) Mad Scientist From: Camillus, NY, USA |
posted 09-01-2000 06:01
No it wasn't.*glares* Here's something I just made while I was once again mucking around...it's definatly...interesting. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-01-2000 07:16
tycho, found a couple pics that may be helpful |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-01-2000 07:22
okay, I saw it now. It is definately better, the faceting is much more apparent. The center is still a bit off though -- it looks like the outer portion is overlapping a sunken center part. It looks great -- shiny as hell, facets are good, but the center..... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Minneapolis, MN, USA |
posted 09-01-2000 07:30
Let me tell you that both your versions of the gem (2nd is better) were probably the best I've seen on the net yet. Even on the first one the faceting was immediately apparent to me. Sorry I can't offer any good criticisms, just thought you should know that it looked right to me, and I'm picky about what i like in CG. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: |
posted 09-01-2000 16:21 |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 09-01-2000 17:46
DL: |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 09-01-2000 19:34
|
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Syr |
posted 09-01-2000 21:32
the third is by far best.. they were all cool , I think you've almost got it...a layer of facets under it? when are you gonna put up the tutorial |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: Long Island, NY |
posted 09-01-2000 23:00
Tycho: Its comming along great. You inspired me last night so around 2AM I was up working on creating my gem. It actually wasnt comming up bad either. Unfortunetly my friend Melanie IMed me on AIM and my Photoshop froze ... happens to me all the time actually =0( So I only had so much of it saved. I dont know why im mentioning this but im going to finish it tonight and post it up here later ... Great work Tycho. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-05-2000 14:14
oh yeah, that's nice tycho! much much more definable form. It is extremely bright and shiny, excellent work all in all <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/biggrin.gif"> |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Boston, MA, USA |
posted 09-05-2000 15:52
Damn Tyco - Photographers all around the world will be cussing you! You've made an image I couldn't with a camera, and yet dopey clients who don't know the difference between artwork and photography (or who don't care) are still going to ask me to duplicate that look anyway! Usually with a stone that's about the size of a small pea. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 09-05-2000 18:11
Haha, Steve! You're probably right, this thing definately took me a good while to complete. Each step was an interesting one, though, I must admit. It also became a lot more complex than I had originally envisioned... partially from 'happy accidents' and partially from taking advice from y'all. It wasn't (and still isnt) easy to wrap my mind around that many light sources, not to mention that you have to represent the thing three dimensionally via its hidden facets and such. It really was a fun project... I may try one more revision before I call it "done", and add a little more definition to the edges and such. |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Bern, Switzerland |
posted 09-05-2000 22:57
hey teycho, your gems looks great. |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 09-06-2000 00:19
Hey, thats a pretty sweet gem. I think It's made in a 3d program, though, not solely in Photoshop. I could be wrong though. Its too bad I dont speak German... we could ask the guy <img border=0 align=absmiddle src="http://www.ozones.com/forum/wink.gif"> |