Topic: To be website |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Darkside of the Moon |
posted 09-02-2003 19:38
I'm designing a website and I'm wondering about screen resolutions. Is 1024x768 the industry standard or shoud I go for an 800x600 hoping thats the lowest anyone goes anymore? Or should I design two identicle websites, one for 1024 and one for 800? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: the west wing |
posted 09-05-2003 07:41
Until someone finally tells the general public that they need to upgrade their damn monitors, design for 800x600...which is to say, 760x420 viewable. Just be glad we're out of 640x480 for the most part. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: California |
posted 09-05-2003 07:47
Mm-hmm. Now see, if you were doing liquid design, this wouldn't be a problem |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Darkside of the Moon |
posted 09-05-2003 13:52
You guys were talking about a "liquid" design. What do you mean by that? Do you use some SHTML or JS to get the images to move around a bit (like in Doc Ozone's Site)? |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Cell 666 |
posted 09-05-2003 14:44
:FAQ: Liquid Design |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS |
posted 09-05-2003 15:05
Put your cursor over the left or right edge of your browser window. Now, left-click and drag your browser window to make it bigger. See how the Asylum flows to fill your window. That is liquid design. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Darkside of the Moon |
posted 09-05-2003 17:49
Ah! Makes so much sense now... Gotcha. With tables right? |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS |
posted 09-05-2003 17:51
Tables or CSS. Either one will work. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-05-2003 19:12
"tables or css" is a very bad way to put it. even if you use tables, you should still be suing CSS to control it. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: California |
posted 09-05-2003 21:27
In my opinion, liquid design is easier with CSS, simply because CSS has so many options and allows so much more control over the page. With tables and plain ol' HTML, it's either pixels or percentages, but CSS gives you things like ems and other cool stuff to play with. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS |
posted 09-05-2003 21:31
DL: In a picky mood today? What I said is correct. What you said is correct. Neither of us really gave enough info to know what's truly involved in making a liquid layout. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Darkside of the Moon |
posted 09-08-2003 17:25
No, but I get the gist. Unfortunately I have broken the laws of web designing and I'm going to make a completely graphic site. (GASP!) So Liquid Design doesn't really matter in this case... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-08-2003 19:58
bug up your ass today krets?? |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS |
posted 09-08-2003 23:48
Nah, just a deep rectal itch caused by anal retentive pricks that pick apart a clearly quick and dirty reply. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: California |
posted 09-09-2003 03:17
quote:
|
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: KC, KS |
posted 09-09-2003 03:26
I'll agree with you on that one oz. However, I was talking about a site like the Asylum that is liquid and works perfectly in most browsers but that won't validate. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-09-2003 04:37
And I didn't say anything about tables not being able to do it |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Darkside of the Moon |
posted 09-10-2003 13:56
o.o But moderator... cussing out another member over a matter that doesn't really matter anymore? |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: under the bed |
posted 09-10-2003 20:33
I feel a little 'cussing' was warranted after being called an 'anal retentive prick' simply because I pointed out a huge error in what someone said.... |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Darkside of the Moon |
posted 09-10-2003 20:40
|
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Den Haag: The Royal Residence |
posted 09-10-2003 23:46
Big wet greasy fish anyone? |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Darkside of the Moon |
posted 09-13-2003 06:04
That was the most beautiful post ever! *sniff* |