Topic: Lynx sucks -st (Page 1 of 1)

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

Nah, MSIE is *the best* web browser, period.

NN6.1 is cool?
ok, i haven't tested it personally, but is there such a big difference to 6.0 ?

You shouldn't use NN6 at all! Why would anyone download 30Mb+ of crap, when there exist Mozilla that is under 10Mb and more up to date (since NN6 is based on it, new version of Mozilla will appear first)...

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

IMHO Currently, there are two biggest things that keep Mozilla down:

1. Slow loading speed. It's soooo damn slow. Also, their workaround idea of starting Mozilla at computer startup is stupid.
2. Stupid cache. They changed caching mechanism starting with version 0.9.0 and automatic checking if page has been changed doesn't work very well anymore. It's most noticable in case of server-side scripts, so you have to choose "check page every time" in order to always have the latest version of the page that's generated by server-side script. Also, their new caching system isn't finished yet (what are they waiting?).

MSIE rules!!

*whisper*yes, Mr. Gates, make the check out to "Cash"*whisper*

Seriously though, I've grown fond of IE and it's a good browser. NN is good too.

IE 5+ is good, EXCEPT it doesn't deliver the latest version of a PHP script, unless you code the script so that it tells the server that the page needs to be always reloaded. I don't know who to blame for that Microsoft or PHP? The problem is that NN4 sometimes has problems with this code. It takes forever to load such a page through a submit button. If I don't make sense, let me know.

what about opera? looks good to me.

Although Opera 5 looks very nice, it misses one very important feature - dynamic page changing (i.e. innerHTML won't work)...

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

InI, that's not completely true. Opera supports CSS1 & CSS2, plus much more. Take a look at this page for more info: http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/