Topic: XML - XSL - XSLT - XHTML - CSS - DOM |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 01-12-2002 02:15
I decided to create this post as I can no longer seem to find a slightly similar post where me and bugs or slime or bit (Sorry, can't remember exactly who it was) were tossing round some ideas about the topic and how they currently fit into the asylum. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 01-12-2002 14:30
Ok then. Obviously this was a silly idea after all.... |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: Berlin (almost) |
posted 01-12-2002 14:58
Well, that's definitely not a silly idea, Dracusis, I also think that the Asylum lacks a part where everything that isn't JavaScript or DHTML and hasn't something to do with sucking browsers can be discussed. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-12-2002 14:59
Dracusis: Its not a silly idea at all and is quite an important one - I'm sure I've been involved in such a discussion where the CSS question came up. Technically DHTML is a combination of JavaScript and CSS so CSS might fit comfortably in that forum (witha quick change in the description). However, I feel CSS will become increasingly important now that we have a range of CSS2-compliantish browsers to select from and that it might warrant its own forum - at the moment questions pop up in site review, all browsers suck and DHTML but that might be OK (although it can make searching a bit tricky and slow). I would certainly support the creation of a CSS forum. XML (and its offspring) will also gain massively in importance - I'm suprised there are so few questions here and I would again support a forum for it but I could imagine traffic would be pretty slow for a while. It may be worth creating a hybrid CSS/XML forum and seeing how that runs. |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 01-12-2002 20:43
Note to Dracusis: always wait 24 hours before deciding no one is going to reply to a post =) |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: the Psychiatric Ward |
posted 01-12-2002 21:43 |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 01-13-2002 01:51
OK... I'm going to stick to my old suggestion that we should merely rename DHTML/Javascript to "client side coding" or something. I don't think we need to create a new forum, since there aren't really *that* many CSS and HTML questions, and the more forums there are, the harder things get. |
Maniac (V) Lord Mad Scientist Sovereign of all the lands Ozone and just beyond that little green line over there... From: Stockholm, Sweden |
posted 01-13-2002 02:29
Yah, widening the DHTML/Javascript forum might cause some problems, it's already one of the busiest forums, opening it further might clutter things up some. The "All Browsers Suck" idea is not a bad idea, browsers *do* all suck, but we don't need to talk about it quite so much anymore, that's a 'slow' forum. I could just steal the naming concept I used with the sig forum and call it... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-13-2002 03:06
Most of the other stuff in the All Browsers Suck forum can be accomodated in Site Reviews (table problems etc.). |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 01-13-2002 04:59
Arr, yeah I guess I sould have waited longer... Thanks for that bit of info slime. |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 01-13-2002 06:34
Hmm, considering how little traffic All Browsers Suck gets, I like Doc's idea of changing it to the... hmm, the "markup languages and style sheets" forum, or sometihng like that. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 01-13-2002 08:30
Good idea slime however DOM is a specific API for XML. 'HTML DOM' is the one we poke with javascript. Still, as long as the forum title get's accross general idea of what should be discussed it doesn't really matter. So yeah, I'd actualy agree that we don't need to specify DOM, or XSLT in the title. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-13-2002 14:49
I suppose the title could actually be trimmed down to 'CSS and XML' as things like XSL, XHTML, XPath, etc. are all XML related (and I doubt we really need a title that picks up on all the related Xxx(x)(x) names just as long as the description picks up the point. I suppose there is a link between the 2 through XSL and CSS can be used on XML so its not like we are lumping 2 completely different things together for lack of anything better!! |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 01-13-2002 18:44
We may want to leave XHTML in there, 'cause we'll get people who don't know the relationship between XML and XHTML and won't know where to take a question. Or, we could just put HTML in there instead of XHTML, since HTML isn't really XML related, but it is a topic not truly covered in DHTML/JS. |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: overlooking the bay |
posted 01-16-2002 08:56
a specific place to ask html questions would be helpful. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
posted 01-17-2002 08:46
http://www.ozoneasylum.com/Forum15/HTML/000042.html |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Brisbane, Australia |
posted 01-17-2002 09:09
Petskull? That topic's like two months old isn't it? |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: 127 Halcyon Road, Marenia, Atlantis |
posted 01-18-2002 10:02
yeah, but it kinda helps, doesn't it? |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: midair |
posted 01-19-2002 08:33
Ok, new to this forum, new to all forums.. so an outsider view.. All Browsers Suck is like "so what?" or "that is so obvious, why mention it?" Are you asking for a browser review? BUT all sucky browsers getz a thorough thrashing when it is related to specific issues like CSS or html or java script.. so this new category makes sense.. and is inclusive of all browsers suck as a recent post by allewyn demonstrates.. the post is related to a specific issue, has a clear problem about sucky browsers and promotes discussion of resolutions and solutions.. but if the All Browsers Suck could be redefined somehow it might be useful if this section becomes a discussion of "how to" rather than "why won't Nav" and "Opera" and so on...render my page correctly... which may be a long time from now as the browsers are not complying very quickly at all at all |
Nervous Wreck (II) Inmate From: Everywhere there's hope |
posted 01-23-2002 15:46
Since there IS so few HTML questions, why not let them slip in here? |