Topic: Me again -> background-attachment: fixed; |
|
---|---|
Author | Thread |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 17:19
Everything I've read says that background-attachment: fixed; works in NN 6 and IE 4+....but my backround image is disappearing....It does work in Windows IE6...I'm at a loss...when I delete the attribute, my image shows back up. http://www.airplusfootcare.com/2002/Index3.html |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-24-2002 17:33
Jeni: We ran into this problem with ideas for turning the GN CSS-only. Its: |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 01-24-2002 17:45
Hmm, according to http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/syndata.html#value-def-uri , the quotes shouldn't be necessary. Darn old browsers. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 17:47
I'm confrooosed. So you're saying I can't have it? Cause what I read there was what I've previously read...I have to be missing something...Can you explain it to me? |
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist From: Massachusetts, USA |
posted 01-24-2002 17:51
Oooh, I think we both misunderstood that background-attachment:fixed was causing the problem. (tip: don't rely on people reading the entire subject line, put all important info in the post itself =) |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 17:55
Good point Slime! I fixed my original post...Hope that helps |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-24-2002 18:07
I must admit I didn't bother addressing the attachment problem because it seemed fine and the only thing I noticed that could be causing the problem was the URL syntax. |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 18:16
Hmmm looking for a reference now in what order to put them in.... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-24-2002 18:22
Jeni: I may be missing the point but I'm looking at it in IE5/Win and there is no problem with the background (a little inner slice of that main curve) staying where it is supposed to in #mainb. What browser/paltform combinations are causing problems (it wasn't too clear to me!!)? |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 18:24
Sorry... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-24-2002 18:38
Jeni: OK that would suggest to me that it is something pretty small and minor in your code as IE/win is the most flexible with code problems (or allows more sloppy code if you want to be harsh!!). I'd try reordering them and then Slime's idea and then create a simple test page. Or run your browsers (you have access to more than I have here) over the CSS1 Test Suite's 'Color and Background Properties' test suite: |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 19:19
Thank you for that test page...It doesn't work in IE 5 Mac...It scrolls with the page....In NN6 it's completely gone. Well at least we know I'm not insane and that it just doesn't work in NNMac. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-24-2002 19:31
Jeni: That is an intersting finding. I am suprised that such a fundamental style breaks so badly in those browsers. Have a look at this page for fun with backgrounds (I'm not sure it will tell you any more than you know but its interesting): quote:
|
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-24-2002 19:56
I'm still not convinced we've tracked down the problem - the background properties on the compatibility chart: |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 20:44
That's the exact chart I referenced at the beginning of all this. It says it should work. I have the browsers. I tested that W3C test page. It doesn't work. I just don't know what to think....Mayhap some compromise is in order....again |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-24-2002 21:10
Jeni: I'm just throwing out ideas here but: |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-24-2002 21:50
I am soooooooo confused. It was the image. But that doesn't make any sense. It doesn't work on the W3C page either. I SWEAR....I am so sorry... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-25-2002 13:31
Jeni: Does this mean you've fixed the problem? Does the test page work properly? |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-25-2002 13:49
Well yes and no. The test page will work as long as I pick an image other then the one I want. I've tried everything I can think of...I resaved it as a gif; as a jpg....I cropped it with more white space....It just wont show up and I don't know what to do.... |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: 8675309 |
posted 01-25-2002 15:34
Okay so I got my test file to work.... |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-25-2002 16:54
Jeni: I suspect you were almost there and it was something pretty basic - typo or not getting the path quite right but its you call (and there is only so long you can spend fiddling with these things!! |
Bipolar (III) Inmate From: midair |
posted 01-25-2002 17:44
Does the background-attachment fixed work outside of the {body tag? I think in Web Monkey it is stated that it does not work on block or inline elements.. I had this problem also so if there is a solution.. hope there is.. |