Topic: Css: drawing the line (image sources in pure css??)

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

As far as I know - no.

Why does it need to be set with the CSS?

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

Yep, bit more of a hassle.

In the long run though, it should help make things more powerful and more flexible as well.

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

It depends what the purpose of the image is, I guess.

An image such as a button for navigation, or a fancy border, would fall under 'style'.

An illustration or photograph or what have you would certainly be content.

If it's for a 'toy' like thing, then (IMO) the lines are not the same as in a 'normal' web page.

The poster has demanded we remove all his contributions, less he takes legal action.
We have done so.
Now Tyberius Prime expects him to start complaining that we removed his 'free speech' since this message will replace all of his posts, past and future.
Don't follow his example - seek real life help first.

I think the simplest way to define weather or not an image is content or decoration is to ask yourself if the URL/location for that image is important information that you'd include in a pure XML version of the document.