Topic: lets standardize flash! Pages that link to <a href="https://ozoneasylum.com/backlink?for=11315" title="Pages that link to Topic: lets standardize flash!" rel="nofollow" >Topic: lets standardize flash!\

 
Author Thread
GRUMBLE
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Omicron Persei 8
Insane since: Oct 2000

IP logged posted posted 05-10-2002 01:41 Edit Quote

i think flash should be standardized by the w3c.org and added to the image tag.

code:
<img alt="myflash" src="myflash.swf" border="0">


just wanted to say that.
opinions?

counterfeitbacon
Paranoid (IV) Inmate

From: Vancouver, WA
Insane since: Apr 2002

IP logged posted posted 05-10-2002 03:11 Edit Quote

hell ya!!!

but how about making it even more simple, then adding optional tags...

<imgsrc="myflash.swf" border="0">

[This message has been edited by counterfeitbacon (edited 05-10-2002).]

Slime
Lunatic (VI) Mad Scientist

From: Massachusetts, USA
Insane since: Mar 2000

IP logged posted posted 05-11-2002 00:01 Edit Quote

In the 4.01 specs, the W3C has a whole explanation of how the <img> tag isn't expandable enough to support emerging things like Flash and whatever other plugins may come out in the future. That's what they introduced the <object> tag for.

Let me see if I can find that page...

Ah, here we are. I encourage you to read at least the first section of this page: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html

GRUMBLE
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist

From: Omicron Persei 8
Insane since: Oct 2000

IP logged posted posted 05-12-2002 14:52 Edit Quote

ok. i just thought because flash isnt like any other plugin. its becoming a webstandard more and more. afaik most browsers come with the flash-plugin preinstalled.



Post Reply
 
Your User Name:
Your Password:
Login Options:
 
Your Text:
Loading...
Options:


« BackwardsOnwards »

Show Forum Drop Down Menu