Topic awaiting preservation: Quintessential Questions We All Must Ask Ourselves (Page 1 of 1) |
|
---|---|
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Stuck inside a Pixar short film |
posted 01-11-2003 17:00
There are 2 things that I REALLY need to know all about and have explained and clarified to me: |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Stuck inside a Pixar short film |
posted 01-11-2003 17:03
Ooops..thought I stopped the posting in time before it submitted. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist with Finglongers From: Cell 53, East Wing |
posted 01-11-2003 17:05
Luxo_Jr: No worries the duplicate is gone - carry on as usually.......... |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Stuck inside a Pixar short film |
posted 01-11-2003 17:07
Cheers mate. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
posted 01-11-2003 17:08
and this really should be down in 3D Modelling, cause that's what all it's questions are based around. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Stuck inside a Pixar short film |
posted 01-11-2003 17:20
Hopefully someone replies to this..down there. |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
posted 01-11-2003 17:31
They will...you can build your own system...render times are all down to basic hardware...processor, Motherboard, memory and HDD access times. If you put a fast processor and enough memory in the right board with a 7200 RPM drive...you can get phenominal render times. I have a Pentium 4 2.26 GHz and 768 meg of ram in mine and I get some pretty damn good render times. Graphics card don't really have that much to do with CG renders. No system is ever going ot be perfect though, and you're going to have to make sacrifices somewhere along the line...you can't have everything. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Houston(ish) Texas |
posted 01-12-2003 00:37
SGI workstations are no longer the end-all CGI systems. Not too many years ago, an SGI Octane would be the dream system. The heavy-hitter apps are getting ported to the Windows platform, though, and the SGI systems no longer leave Intel (or AMD) systems in the dust. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Stuck inside a Pixar short film |
posted 01-12-2003 17:09
Thanks for that Das |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 01-12-2003 23:17
the MPEG-4(AAC & TwinVQ) ones. |
Maniac (V) Inmate From: Stuck inside a Pixar short film |
posted 01-13-2003 13:52
That audio codec doesnt make any sense genis. I ran it and it just says drop files here, so I did that and nothing happened: |
Paranoid (IV) Inmate From: Dallas, TX |
posted 01-13-2003 16:15
What? The ogg vorbis? |
Paranoid (IV) Mad Scientist From: Houston, TX, USA |
posted 01-15-2003 05:21
if i were going to do a lot of video i'd get a mac, FAR easier to import sources into than a pc and you've got final cut pro (and the new final cut express) to edit with. lightwave and maya are both available for the mac, which would be the two packages i'd recommend for 3d (unless you have tons of cash to burn and want softimage xsi). |
Maniac (V) Mad Scientist From: :morF |
posted 01-15-2003 10:58
A mac isn't actually the best option, especially when your entire life has been spent on a PC. It's not like a mac can do anything a PC can't. You can get IEEE 1394 Firewire cards esaily for PC, my Sound Blaster Audigy has one built into it. A mac's interface is also awkward ot anyone who's used a PC mainly in life, the whole COMMAND+CLICK interface is clunky. Just about the only thing from a mac that you can't run on a PC is iMovie, which I wouldn't use in a pink fit anyway. |