Topic awaiting preservation: This sig really clashes with the OZONE, but...

Tell me what you think aside from that...

I think it's cool Maskkkk. It does clash here but maybe if you gave it a transparent BG and changed the letter colour to gold, yellow or orange it would match here. It's neat looking.

nah.

keep it blue. make the grey transparent, and drop the size about in half, and you;ve got a keeper.

you may notice that the background color for this site is blue....afterall....

=)

Yeah that's what Emps said to...
(help I can't seem to get the transparncy to work)

And I said that here:
http://development.gurusnetwork.com/discussion/thread/1911/

and help on transparency? Well Mr. Mabry has already dealt with this issue:
www.gurusnetwork.com/tutorials/photoshop/transparency_1.html

___________________
Emps

FAQs: Emperor

You could always go the more subtle route with this as well...



overall i like it.. yep.
it could probably use a tid bit of sizing down.... but that's my personaly preference... There's plenty of larger sigs around here.


FAQs n' Bits: Michael

mask did my tutor help?

quote:

---

There's plenty of larger sigs around here.

---

Yep, but 90% of those really need to be smaller too!

It definately needs to be sized down - prefereably in half...although you could get away with a little bigger than that.

quote:

---

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's plenty of larger sigs around here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yep, but 90% of those really need to be smaller too!

---

And 83% of that 90% are yours Maskkk and we have mentioned each time that you should make them smaller

Its not a sign of one's manhood - its annoying

___________________
Emps

FAQs: Emperor

Hmmm, dunno Emps, I think DG has quite a large chunk of that market monopolized.

Maskkkk, here's a quick re-work, following DL & Emp's advice.
(I hate doing it for you, but you're screaming for help, so I've included a brief tutorial too so maybe you could try it yourself?).

Step 1: Select the Gray background, then [Image]>[Adjustments]>[Replace Color]. Set lightness to -100
(Repeat this step for all the redundant grey areas, (using the +eyedropper icon) until all they're black).
Step 2: Change the layer mode to screen (make the black invisible).
Step 3: Add a new layer, beneath the one you're working on. Fill it with

Yeah but if ya make it too small you lose all the detial

You can but try...

Dufty: Good effort

Maskkk: Welllllll either don't put in so much detail or try it at a larger size - it was just an example.

krets: Good point - thats the trouble with made up statistics they always let you down

___________________
Emps

FAQs: Emperor

Mask - well there's a very easy solution for that: don't make it so fucking big to start with!!

If you make it small to begin with, there won't be a resizing process in which to lose anything.

Plain and simple.

quote:

---

very easy solution for that

---

90% of the time there is a very easy solution.


FAQs n' Bits: Michael

And 90 % of the time she is not obvious


Confine yourself to observing and you always miss the point of your own life. The object can be stated this way : Live the best life you can. Life is a game whose rules you learn if you leap into it and play it to the hilt. Otherwise, you are caught off balance, continually surprised by the shifting play. Non-players often whine and complain that luck always passes them by. They refuse to see that they can create some of their own luck.
--Darwi Odrade

Yep, DG's sigs are huge.

Though he really doesn't seem to give a fuck as the whining about such ended ages ago.

Didn't we have a basic size rule in the FAQ somewhere? I think sticking to that's a nice idea, and the guideline "Only as much space as is necessary to get the point across." Your dots could probably be a bit smaller Maskkkk without losing too much in detail. Try it, and if it isn't what you want, then screw it.

Hell at least it looks lightyears better then the first crap you posted, and that vertical nightmare of a macaroni box.

quote:

---

and that vertical nightmare of a macaroni box.

---

99% of the time I hated the macaroni box.



FAQs n' Bits: Michael

There was a 1% when you didn't?

no. that 1% was undecided.
sometimes i'd just be browsing around and be so damn tired that it'd make me laugh because it was so stupid.

FAQs n' Bits: Michael

Hmmm...I rather liked the Macaroni Box...

The sig, though, doesn't look over-ly big, but it is pretty space consuming. Maybe just reducing it 25-40% would save some of the detail while making it smaller.

Uh, call me stupid, but uh, isn't "big" and "space-consuming" the same thing?

Ahh I dunno maybe..



[This message has been edited by Maskkkk (edited 03-03-2003).]

Ok please choose:

Big and nice
or
Small and Loud
Not
Big & Loud...

"Freedom of speech is by no means freedom to insult others" from the Razorart goodbye letter.

DL: stupid

Maskk: smaller!

:::krets.net:::

I wasn't sure who, but I knew *someone* would....